[NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique

[Ron Van Putte]

On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Glenn Hatfield wrote:

> What is it?

It is a 40-size airplane with a fiberglass fuselage.  I put a Super  
Tigre 46 on it.  It weighed a TON.  This was before we discovered  
that light is better.  It would often snap roll in an landing  
approach, however, it never crashed and doesn't have a scratch on  
it.   It kept me light on the controls.

Ron Van Putte

>
> --- vanputte at cox.net wrote:
>
> From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:52:19 -0600
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Bob Richards wrote:
>
> I guess it is a safe bet you don't have any planes older than that???
>
> Not true.  I have an airplane in my shop that I flew in Dayton, OH  
> in the mjd 1960s.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
>
> Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>
> Rookies!  I have some shoes older than you guys.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061206/2e386067/attachment-0001.html