[NSRCA-discussion] New YS ???

[adriancwong at earthlink.net]

170 should start production in early 07. YS is trying to finish fulfilling the back orders of the 160.

Believe me, the motor is powerful, even more so than the 160. I've seen two of them ran at a contest two weeks ago, scary power.

Adrian

-----Original Message-----
>From: Adam Glatt <adam.g at sasktel.net>
>Sent: Aug 13, 2006 6:18 PM
>To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] New YS ???
>
>As an electric guy who has seen the YS 170 in two big competitions now 
>(France WC and 06 Muncie), I believe the 170 can be used to fly pattern 
>just as well as any electric motor.  The pattern will look a little 
>different, of course, but it can be just as good or better: see Onda and 
>CPLR.
>-Adam
>
>Koenig, Tom wrote:
>> Hello again Pattern world,
>>  
>> Since everyone is talking about electric power these days-I thought 
>> I'd throw out this question.
>>  
>> Is there a new YS being planned that anyone knows of or is testing? Troy?
>>  
>> I don't believe the 170 is slated for release, nor do I believe this 
>> will be an adequate 'competitor' for the current generation of 'E' 
>> power plants. I would have thought Yamada San would need to work on 
>> something that would blow our socks off. The OS 200 4 stroke is 
>> supposed to be on its way-but so is Christmas!!
>>  
>> Anyone in the know?
>>  
>> Tom
>> ************************************************************************
>> *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
>> be confidential. If received in error, please delete all
>> copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or
>> dissemination of this email or its attachments is
>> prohibited without the consent of the sender.
>>
>> WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
>> outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty
>> is given that this email or its attachments are virus free.
>> Before opening or using attachments, please check for
>> viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any
>> affected attachments.
>>
>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the
>> individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
>> and with authority, states them to be the views of the
>> organisation.
>> ************************************************************************
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>   
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion