[NSRCA-discussion] You, at the Nats
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Fri Aug 4 06:32:29 AKDT 2006
On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:03 AM, twtaylor wrote:
> Just think “Bomb Shelters” you’re old enough to remember those
> built in the late 50’s. J
I was just "stirring the pot'. I remember basements well from my
youth, through college.
Ron Van Putte
former Rochester, NY resident
>
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 9:33 AM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] You, at the Nats
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2006, at 6:22 AM, Grow Pattern wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Probably because they don't have to live in heated basements for
> 2/5 of the year!!!!
>
>
>
> "Permafrost" is what they have on a doughnut!
>
>
>
> Basement? I've heard of those. Aren't they kinda like caves?
> Aren't they cold and moldy? Don't they leak and need to be pumped
> out? Just asking.
>
>
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> Fort Walton Beach, Florida
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: John Pavlick
>
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
>
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:02 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] You, at the Nats
>
>
>
> Why is everyone is from (AMA) D5 or D6? Maybe I should move out
> there...
>
>
>
> John Pavlick
> http://www.idseng.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Grow Pattern
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:24 AM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] You, at the Nats
>
> Jason,
>
> Just for fun, and never being one to shy away from a
> challenge, here are the conceptual team champions for all of the
> classes that I could calculate.
>
>
>
> This is just to show you (all) what could be done to add some
> excitement for those who do not always make it to the podium.
>
>
>
> This is only for fun and is not mathematically confirmed/accurate.
> It is only based upon the names of the top few pilots who also gave
> me data sheets. I cross referenced their AMA districts.
> (Interestingly enough, some top pilots did not know to which AMA
> district they belonged to!) This should really be calculated by
> adding up the top three sets of pilot-points per district, but I
> had no option other than to use the highest positions.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> AMA District Team Champions
>
>
>
> Intermediate Team Champs
>
> Position Name District
>
> 5. Gary Courtney D-5
>
> 6. Jon Lowe D-5
>
> 9. Robert Green D-5
>
>
>
> Advanced Team Champs
>
> Position Name District
>
> 1. Brett Wickizer D-6
>
> 4. Keith Black D-6
>
> 7. Chris Moon D-6
>
>
>
>
>
> Masters Team Champs
>
> Position Name District
>
> 1. Ryan McLaughlin D-5
>
> 3. A.C. Glen D-5
>
> 4. John Fuqua D-5
>
>
>
> FAI - Not enough prelims info readily available or district id’s
> to calculate three pilots.
>
> As an FYI guys for next year….., IL, TX, AZ, OH and AR
>
> are not AMA Districts!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
> Just for you Jason, and as another FYI for everyone else -
>
>
>
> FAI progression was as follows for the top 5;
>
> End of P-07 End of Semis F-07 Finals
>
> Jason Sean
> QuiQue
>
> Sean Quique Chip
>
> QuiQue
> Jason Jason
>
> Chip Don Don
>
> Don Chip Sean
>
>
>
> Most interesting how the unknowns sorts it all out - Hamm?
>
>
>
> I could see a future where a couple of pilots encourage a third or
> fourth pilot to attend the Nat's so that they would have a team of
> three and therefore stand a chance of winning the Nationals team
> award for their class.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Eric.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: JShulman
>
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:03 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] me, at the Nats
>
>
>
> Eric,
>
>
>
> I don't think it's unfair to ask George about this. There is no
> need to define a "team" or what the "team" would be flying against.
> There were 8 finalists (even though one was a Canadian) that flew
> well enough to be in the finals, and I would just like to see how
> we did in the P-07. Remember, the Team at the Worlds is determined
> by P-07, and hypothetically looking at P-07 we would see who did
> the best (in George's eye) in P-07. Again, please remember, this is
> all for FUN and nothing more.
>
>
>
> Also, when are you going to have the District results for us
> Eric... it's only Excel...lol.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Jason
> www.jasonshulman.com
> www.shulmanaviation.com
> www.composite-arf.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Grow Pattern
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:09 PM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] me, at the Nats
>
> Jason,
>
>
>
> Ref. "Hey George, if you feel like it, how about posting the
> results of the Finalists P-07 rounds? See how a "Team" would have
> done."
>
>
>
> It's a bit unfair to ask Georgie to do that because he can't do it
> unless you, a) define a team and, b) define what teams that team
> would be flying against.
>
>
>
> At one time I was hoping that we would have District team awards in
> our FAI prelims and in each of the other classes. It would have
> been great to see which districts won a "National" team title. It
> did not have to be an AMA award but just like our district
> individual District champions it would have added a nice flavor. I
> think it was a wee bit too radical at the time.
>
>
>
> You could do it now. All you have to do is add up the top three
> scores from each district in each class. You could do it in Excel
> in about four minutes if you had the results files and plugged in a
> district column.
>
>
>
> One for Rusty Dose perhaps?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060804/1cb10164/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list