[NSRCA-discussion] Single motor rule. . .

[DaveL322 at comcast.net]

Perfect!!!

Assuming somewhere around a 17-12 in the low 8000s, and 10.5 lb takeoff weight......the really good glow setups are pushing 250-275 watts per pound (at the prop).

2600 watts (70 amps x 37 volts) from a lipo w/ 90% efficient ESC/motor is 2340 watts - pick your plane weight to figure the rest.

Dave
-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Glenn Hatfield" <randy10926 at comtekmail.com> 

> Just what I need - 5 to 1 thrust to weight ratio. 
> 
> Randy 
> 
> --- kerlock at comcast.net wrote: 
> 
> From: "Mike Hester" 
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Single motor rule. . . 
> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:35:36 -0400 
> 
> We want specs!!!!!! 
> 
> -Mike 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ron Van Putte" 
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:30 PM 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Single motor rule. . . 
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Apr 12, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Michael Cohen wrote: 
> > 
> >> Probably too loud to use for us. 
> > 
> > It sounded reasonably quiet to me when they took it to full 
> > throttle. They couldn't do it for long, because they would have 
> > blown the adjacent booth away! 
> > 
> > Ron Van Putte 
> > 
> >> 
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Ron Van Putte" 
> >> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:40 PM 
> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Single motor rule. . . 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Apr 12, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Keith Hoard wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>>> Gentlemen, 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Would this be legal in a pattern model? 
> >>> 
> >>> I don't see why not. It has a spinner. 
> >>> 
> >>> It puts out 5 HP, so you'd better put it on a BIG airplane, but then 
> >>> you'd violate the 3 meter rule. 
> >>> 
> >>> BTW, I was at Toledo; were you there? If so, why didn't you stop by 
> >>> the radio South booth? 
> >>> 
> >>> Ron Van Putte 
> >>> _______________________________________________ 
> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> >>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________ 
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060413/dfe3e258/attachment.html