INCIDENCE settings
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Fri Sep 30 13:00:45 AKDT 2005
On Sep 30, 2005, at 3:36 PM, randy10926 at comcast.net wrote:
> I remember wheel landing in cubs, champs, chiefs, stinstons, L-4s,
> L-5s, L-19s, Wacos and etc. God I must be getting really old. Ah a
> flight in a T-34 would be fun; again.
Ah, yes. My last two rides in airplanes, other than what Delta and
Northwest fly, were in an RV-6 (two months ago) and in a Christen Eagle
(five years ago).
Sorry for the off-topic post, I couldn't resist.
Ron Van Putte
>> -------------- Original message --------------
>> Lets not forget the B52 looks like it is nose down on takeoff.
>>
>> WG
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Ron Van Putte
>>> To: Bob Richards
>>> Cc: discussion at nsrca.org
>>> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 12:45 PM
>>> Subject: Re: INCIDENCE settings
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 30, 2005, at 12:39 PM, Bob Richards wrote:
>>>
>>>> That is a pet peeve of mine as well.
>>>>
>>>> Remember the Hobie Hawk glider? It flew nose down -- WAY down. It
>>>> was designed that way. It was not a balance issue at all.
>>>
>>> I do remember the Hobie Hawk and how it flew.
>>>
>>> A J-3 Cub on a proper final approach looks nose-down as well, but
>>> many pilots won't let it come in that way. As a result, they'll
>>> never enjoy a wheel landing on a Cub.
>>>
>>> Ron Van Putte
>>>
>>>> Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> This discussion also tapped into one of my pet peeves: Guy sees an
>>>>> airplane flying around with the tail low and announces, "That
>>>>> airplane
>>>>> is tail heavy". Probably wrong. The incidence relationship between
>>>>> the wing and the horizontal tail is probably incorrect. The CG has
>>>>> an
>>>>> effect, but the condition is usually caused by a bad trim setup.
>>>>> Now I
>>>>> feel better.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 3108 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050930/05f15193/attachment.bin
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list