[SPAM] Re: 2007 Masters 404 Option A

[Troy A. Newman]

One other note there were some mild typos in the Sportsman sequence...a 1/2 
Cuban got swapped with a 1/2 reverse This was fixed before it was submitted 
to AMA and the Aresti is correct.  I knew I'd catch hell on that but it was 
my mistake. A last minute change before I submitted it to the board and the 
KF and a version didn't get updated. This puts the two 1/2 rev Cubans 
separate in  the sequence instead of Back to Back. Also gives more time to 
setup for the last big figure of the 401 sequence.

Just a heads up guys.

By the way these are not approved they have been sent into the contest board 
and must be voted on at least a couple of times over the next year. Also 
cross proposals can happen.

Troy
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Troy A. Newman" <troy_newman at msn.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 6:49 AM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: 2007 Masters 404 Option A


> Bob, et all
>
> Aresti documents were submitted with all sequences to the AMA. I have sent 
> these documents to Lamar for posting on the website.
>
> I went through them with a fine tooth comb but if there are any errors or 
> questions I will clear it up. I will be out of town until Thursday Nov 3.
>
> Thanks
>
> Troy
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bob Pastorello" <rcaerobob at cox.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 3:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: 2007 Masters 404 Option A
>
>
>>A good reason to use Aresti notation.
>>
>> Bob Pastorello
>> www.rcaerobats.net
>> rcaerobob at cox.net
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Troy A. Newman" <troy_newman at msn.com>
>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 11:25 PM
>> Subject: [SPAM] Re: 2007 Masters 404 Option A
>>
>>
>>> Jim,
>>>
>>> incorrect. Why does there have to be a straight line? The 2/4pt is not 
>>> defined by the pause on the second point. What happens when you do a 
>>> regular split S...do you have to define the 1/2 roll by a pause to show 
>>> that really did a 1/2 roll?
>>>
>>> The model performs a 2/4pt roll on a horizontal line and immediately (no 
>>> pause) pulls to complete a 1/2 inside loop. The definition is the same 
>>> as the immelman turns, bunts and split S figure. FAI has these figures 
>>> also and they are always immediate connected elements. You guys are 
>>> currently doing a couple of Immelmans the same way...The loops segment 
>>> is immediate. A couple years ago you had a bunt with 2/4pt out. This is 
>>> similar.
>>>
>>> Remember the wording or name of figure can be misleading....The word 
>>> description with downgrades is the determining regulation on the figure. 
>>> You can call it what ever you like. The term Split S with 2/4pt roll is 
>>> a shorthand for the reality of the figure.
>>>
>>> Troy
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Jim Ivey" <jivey61 at bellsouth.net>
>>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:46 PM
>>> Subject: 2007 Masters 404 Option A
>>>
>>>
>>>> Sure is quiet.   Question???    Number 11    in 2007 404 Masters Option 
>>>> A schedule  states ---2/4pt roll,1/2 inside loop(split S with 2/4pt 
>>>> roll). There is no straight line after the roll and before the 1/2 loop 
>>>> in a split S.  In order to demonstrate a 2/4pt before the 1/2 loop 
>>>> there has to be a straight line before the 1/2 loop.   The phrase 
>>>> (split S with 2/4pt roll)does not apply correctly here.
>>>> Tell me I'm right or tell me I'm wrong. I'm easy.
>>>>
>>>> Jim Ivey
>>>>
>>>> =================================================
>>>> If you want your reply email to go to the list, you must Cc: the list!
>>>>
>>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>> To be removed from this list, go to 
>>>> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>> and follow the instructions.
>>>>
>>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> =================================================
>>> If you want your reply email to go to the list, you must Cc: the list!
>>>
>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> and follow the instructions.
>>>
>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
>>> list.
>>>
>>
>> =================================================
>> If you want your reply email to go to the list, you must Cc: the list!
>>
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
>> list.
>>
>>
> =================================================
> If you want your reply email to go to the list, you must Cc: the list!
>
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>
> 
=================================================
If you want your reply email to go to the list, you must Cc: the list!

To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.