[SPAM] Re: 2007 Masters 404 Option A

Bob Pastorello rcaerobob at cox.net
Sat Oct 29 02:18:40 AKDT 2005


A good reason to use Aresti notation.

Bob Pastorello
www.rcaerobats.net
rcaerobob at cox.net
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Troy A. Newman" <troy_newman at msn.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 11:25 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: 2007 Masters 404 Option A


> Jim,
>
> incorrect. Why does there have to be a straight line? The 2/4pt is not 
> defined by the pause on the second point. What happens when you do a 
> regular split S...do you have to define the 1/2 roll by a pause to show 
> that really did a 1/2 roll?
>
> The model performs a 2/4pt roll on a horizontal line and immediately (no 
> pause) pulls to complete a 1/2 inside loop. The definition is the same as 
> the immelman turns, bunts and split S figure. FAI has these figures also 
> and they are always immediate connected elements. You guys are currently 
> doing a couple of Immelmans the same way...The loops segment is immediate. 
> A couple years ago you had a bunt with 2/4pt out. This is similar.
>
> Remember the wording or name of figure can be misleading....The word 
> description with downgrades is the determining regulation on the figure. 
> You can call it what ever you like. The term Split S with 2/4pt roll is a 
> shorthand for the reality of the figure.
>
> Troy
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jim Ivey" <jivey61 at bellsouth.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:46 PM
> Subject: 2007 Masters 404 Option A
>
>
>> Sure is quiet.   Question???    Number 11    in 2007 404 Masters Option A 
>> schedule  states ---2/4pt roll,1/2 inside loop(split S with 2/4pt roll). 
>> There is no straight line after the roll and before the 1/2 loop in a 
>> split S.  In order to demonstrate a 2/4pt before the 1/2 loop there has 
>> to be a straight line before the 1/2 loop.   The phrase (split S with 
>> 2/4pt roll)does not apply correctly here.
>> Tell me I'm right or tell me I'm wrong. I'm easy.
>>
>> Jim Ivey
>>
>> =================================================
>> If you want your reply email to go to the list, you must Cc: the list!
>>
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
>> list.
>>
>>
> =================================================
> If you want your reply email to go to the list, you must Cc: the list!
>
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
> 

=================================================
If you want your reply email to go to the list, you must Cc: the list!

To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list