Glow Engine Vs. Electric Engine for 2 m' pattern plane

[J.Oddino]

If electric works better it will dominate even if it costs more.  Remember, life is too short to drink cheap beer.
Jim O
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Koenig, Tom 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:54 PM
  Subject: Glow Engine Vs. Electric Engine for 2 m' pattern plane


  Ed and others

  I'm not so sure it is such a silly comparison for people outside of the US, where costs can be considerable in the fuel department. Our figures indicate that at we would be at 'break even' point if we get 100 flights a pack. Anything more and its gravy. We are not including things like I/C engine rebuilds etc either. We simply treated the packs as 'fuel' in our estimations. Like anything, maintenance and correct installation is an issue/learning curve...and done properly I can see Electric making economic rationale.

  Now if anyone can just give us more info on how it actually 'feels' to fly the FAI pattern?

  Anyone...please????

  best regards

  Tom
    -----Original Message-----
    From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ed Alt
    Sent: Monday, 30 May 2005 8:39 AM
    To: discussion at nsrca.org
    Subject: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Glow Engine Vs. Electric Engine for 2 m' pattern plane


    Yes and you need to figure out the jump in your electric bill.  Getting silly isn't it?  It's a 2:1 comparison, assuming the batteries last, which apparently, they don't.

    Ed
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Nat Penton 
        ************************************************************************
        *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
        be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
        copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
        dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
        prohibited without the consent of the sender.

        WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
        outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
        is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
        Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
        viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
        affected attachments.

        Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
        individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
        and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
        organisation.
        ************************************************************************
       
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050531/f6f47673/attachment.html