calling complete for new takeoff

Grow Pattern pattern4u at comcast.net
Sun May 15 20:35:08 AKDT 2005


The NSRCA judging committee was formed to explain and clarify any confusing rules text and rules explanations. It consults with the AMA contest board when it need a rules interpretation or where an area is not covered by the written rules.

Don Ramsey accumulates the rules "problems"  and submits them as questions to the NSRCA survey and updates the training scripts etc.

The take-off and landing rules-change was submitted by the AMA Contest Committee Chairperson, John Fuqua and co-signed by Tony Stillman and Ron Van-putte. This was not an NSRCA proposal. It was, in fact, the opposite to the NSRCA majority vote to keep the landings and take-off's. (We often refer to this type of proposal as a private proposal.) 

The "private proposal" was not processed by the NSRCA judging committee nor the NSRCA board. The proposal did reach the AMA rules book with the English that we are wrestling with today. 

Even though it should have been looked at and tailored for each AMA class the new system is basically a facsimile of the FAI system. Knowing this we should be able to implement it effectively during the season. We will ask the question again in the 2005-7 survey. Then subject to what you all think we will propose a change or not, as the case may be!

Regards,

Eric.

P.S. I personally think that our skill in landing and take-off is one worth preserving!



----- Original Message ----- 
  From: RUDDERCABL at aol.com 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 10:15 PM
  Subject: Re: calling complete for new takeoff


  In a message dated 5/15/2005 2:31:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, derekkoopowitz at earthlink.net writes:
    What do you mean by that comment, George?

  As I see it, the meaning was "VERY CLEAR" !  I understood it fully. 

  Robert Gainey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050516/d38c80e9/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list