[SPAM] Re: JR 10SX
John Ferrell
johnferrell at earthlink.net
Tue Mar 22 10:23:04 AKST 2005
I flew there yesterday with Bill, no problems....
But I know my credibility is lacking,
after all I used to fly a V-tail Bonanza and
I Rallyed Corvairs!
John Ferrell
http://DixieNC.US
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Richards" <bob at toprudder.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: JR 10SX
> Bill,
>
> I am one of the people that will not fly at that
> field. I went to two contests there, at the first,
> lots of people crashed from interference (five or
> six?). At the second, same situation, and I almost
> crashed from interference. Both times all I heard from
> club memebers were "we've never had a problem here". I
> could buy that at the first contest, but not the next,
> since I SAW the problems at the first contest.
>
> I did a check with a spectrum analyzer there at the
> second contest, but it was not conclusive. However,
> while I was there under the shelter, a flyer asked for
> a pin on one of the ham freqs. The club member who was
> handling the impound gave it to him. A few minutes
> later the flyer came back, said he almost crashed, and
> asked if I saw anything on his freq. Before I could
> dial in that freq, the impound person, the one that
> gave him the pin, said "oh, we have a problem on that
> freq". I was appalled.
>
> I would like to know why I was getting hits there.
> I've not had a problem anywhere else that I have
> flown. I had talked with someone after the fact about
> what I should be looking for based on the particular
> radios that seemed to be getting hits. I suspect there
> is a logical explanation for why the hits were
> happening, too lengthy to go into online. I believe
> there is a problem there. I'm sorry, but I will not
> fly there until it can be explained, and I don't think
> that is going to happen as long as the club members
> want to believe there is no problem.
>
> Bob R.
>
>
> --- Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Ed:
>> Do you not think that we will always be subject to
>> interference as long
>> as we are "secondary" users? Admittedly, more could
>> be done.
>> As an aside: I fly frequently at a field that has a
>> huge (2000 ft. tall)
>> antenna directly behind us. It is no more than 300
>> yds. away at the
>> flyers 6 o'clock position. Yet, even though pattern
>> flyers won't come
>> and fly there, (probably because of the frightening
>> specter of that
>> powerful antenna) folks fly there literally every
>> day of the year with
>> no interference. I'm one of the frequent flyers.
>> Unfortunately, it
>> seems that most of the pattern folks have just
>> enough information to be
>> dangerous when they shun this field.. BTW: a check
>> for interference
>> shows that there is less interference literally in
>> the shadow of this
>> antenna, than there is at another local field, yet
>> the other field,
>> which shows a higher level of "hash" is quite
>> popular. Ignorance is bliss.
>>
>> Bill Glaze
>>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list