Lawsuit Update
Norm500
Norm500 at comcast.net
Mon Mar 21 08:44:14 AKST 2005
The one time my business was taken to small claims court by a
customer, (in New Mexico), I consulted with my lawyer before going
to court. His recommendation was that I didn't need him in the
small claims court, but if I lost, then he would represent me in
an appeal which is apparently more formal. I won BTW so didn't
need him. I do think it prudent to check with a lawyer and get
his advice before going to court however.
Norm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gray E Fowler" <gfowler at raytheon.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 9:17 AM
Subject: Lawsuit Update
>I met with other club officials Saturday morning and here is what
>we are
> doing.
>
> There was much discussion on whether to get a lawyer or not.
> Some fear
> that in Small claims in front of a JP, which by the way ignores
> all normal
> court rules, a lawyer would piss off the JP. This lady does not
> have a
> lawyer because she cannot really afford one. We are calling all
> current
> club members and asking if they have had any interaction with
> this lady
>
> 1. Are you aware of anyone crashing on or near her property.
> 2. Did she come over to our property and fall and break her arm
>
> We are filing a response today denying all claims of trespassing
> and the
> breaking of her arm. Included in our response will be the prior
> history
> with this lady which includes
>
> 1. A face to face meeting with the County Managers who reveiwed
> our club
> documents.
> 2. A live noise demo that resulted in the County stating in
> writing that a
> noise problem does not exist and that they recognize that the
> flying
> boundaries are for reference only, and that occasional overflys
> do happen
> by accident and it is not a problem.
> 3. Repeated Sherrif visits from her complaints, where as no
> action is ever
> taken.
> 4. Results from County Commisioners court in front of a judge,
> whereas her
> claims were dismissed.
>
> The JP will then make a decision on whether or not to hear this
> case. Our
> club members really think our response will end this, I do not.
> I feel that our club members, like 90% of the rest of the world
> are
> fearful of lawyers. Most view lawyers as an expensive solution
> that they
> have no control of. When you hire a lawyer, and go to court, you
> are in a
> very "specialty" situation that frankly the average citizen does
> not
> comprehend, nor can properly react to. I think we (my club)are
> absolute
> fools for not getting a lawyer. The Club Pres has said if the
> JP accepts
> this case we will reconsider obtaining a lawyer. My polling of
> club
> members indicates that people who are against a lawyer have
> never retianed
> a lawyer, but they sure hate them. A few that are for it have
> had a lawyer
> and see the benefits. Of couse the AMA told us to deny all
> claims and not
> to get a lawyer. They willn help us if this got out of hand, but
> not right
> now.
> I find it absurd to believe that a JP would get pissed off that
> we brought
> a lawyer. Hey! We are talking about $5000! I would think that
> the JP would
> think we are idiots for NOT having a lawyer. I see this as a
> method for
> ending this lady's claims now and forever. I think we should go
> after her
> in writing for OUR court costs which include legal fees. I never
> expect
> restitution but I do want her to know that we take this serious
> and will
> fight her to the bitter end. He has has most cash wins, and in
> this case
> we have much more cash. We can spend $1000 in lawyer fees now
> and be done
> with it.
>
> I would bet that MOST of you out there who have been to court
> with a
> lawyer are with me and those of you who have never have been to
> court are
> against my thoughts. There is a wild card, which is JP court.
> Anything
> goes, and for that reason I realize I could be wrong.
>
> So we are posting a denial of all claims today.
>
> On trespassing...one of of members is a Plano Cop. Here is the
> Police and
> court take on Trespassing. Posted or not posted means nothing.
> You can
> step on anyones property at any time. If the owner asks you to
> leave, you
> must leave and be given the chance to leave. To make it legal,
> and hold up
> in court, a police office must witness this exchange. Now I am
> sure that
> if she tells a person to get off in January and a cop (or other
> witness)
> is there and you show up again in Feb and once again witnessed,
> then you
> are trespassing. Flying over her trailer is not trespassing.
>
>
>
> Gray Fowler
> Principal Chemical Engineer
> Composites Engineering
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list