[SPAM] Re: Spinner poll

Bill Glaze billglaze at triad.rr.com
Mon Mar 14 07:57:16 AKST 2005


Dave:
Out of curiosity, (I know you ae a tireless experimenter) have you ever 
seen anything qualitative that you could pin on spinner size?  You are, 
of course, exactly correct with your statement below.  Also, there might 
ba a small flywheel effect which would increase with spinner weight, but 
I sure would hate to call it anything but theoretical
Bill Glaze.

DaveL322 at comcast.net wrote:

> The hub area of a prop is typically pretty inefficient (it is 
> difficult to get enough pitch in the prop) so the large spinner helps 
> streamline the center of the prop and reduce drag.
>
> Dave
>  
>
>     -------------- Original message --------------
>
>     > Other than appearance, is there any advantage of a big spinner
>     over a
>     > smaller one?
>     >
>     > John Ferrell
>     > http://DixieNC.US
>     >
>     > ----- Original Message -----
>     > From: "Dean Pappas"
>     > To:
>     > Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 5:25 PM
>     > Subject: RE: Spinner poll
>     >
>     >
>     > > Hi Jason,
>     > > I drew the new ship at 3-3/8 and wished I'd gone up to 3-1/2.
>     > > At least then I could have used a heavy plastic CB products
>     spinner!
>     > > Let me guess, you are making recommendations for an updated
>     airplane?
>     > > As I look at E-power, I am contemplating a flow thru spinner,
>     rather than
>     > > an annular opening, a la the old Cutlass Supreme.
>     > >
>     > > Later,
>     &g! t; > Dean
>     >
>     >
>     > =================================================
>     > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>     > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>     > To be removed from this list, go to
>     http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>     > and follow the instructions.
>     > 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050314/f0667854/attachment-0001.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list