Spinner poll

[Dean Pappas]

Hi John,
For wet stuff, how about housing the engine and soft mount? 
For E-stuff how about bigger, quieter gearboxes and belt reducers or large diameter outrunners?

Dean Pappas
Sr. Design Engineer
Kodeos Communications
111 Corporate Blvd.
South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
(908) 222-7817 phone
(908) 222-2392 fax
d.pappas at kodeos.com


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of John Ferrell
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:28 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Spinner poll


Other than appearance, is there any advantage of a big spinner over a 
smaller one?

John Ferrell
http://DixieNC.US

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dean Pappas" <d.pappas at kodeos.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 5:25 PM
Subject: RE: Spinner poll


> Hi Jason,
> I drew the new ship at 3-3/8 and wished I'd gone up to 3-1/2.
> At least then I could have used a heavy plastic CB products spinner!
> Let me guess, you are making recommendations for an updated airplane?
> As I look at E-power, I am contemplating a flow thru spinner, rather than 
> an annular opening, a la the old Cutlass Supreme.
>
> Later,
> Dean


=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.