[SPAM] Counting others' AMA points / WAS RE: Rules Changes----Advancement

[rick wallace]

Georgie -- 

Hmmmm. the only classes where AMA points counting matters are Intermediate
and Advanced.  I'm seeing 'points abuse' / homesteading in a class as a
non-issue, at least in D1. Maybe I'm missing something. 

 

I've been keeping the D1 champs points for the last three years, and as of
2004 I started tracking all finishing places for all classes for all D1
contests. (great idea, Scott! Thanks) 

 

I also kept my own points count thru Intermediate and Advanced, and moved up
only when I pointed out of each class - and yes, that meant flying Advanced
in 2004 after winning the 2003 Advanced district championship  (and NOT
repeating as champ, thank you very much, Ed! <g>) - because I wasn't ready
to move up. 

 

I kind of enjoy keeping the District champs stats, and making them available
to the District via our web page, but I DON"T particularly want to be the
district watchdog for counting all the AMA points for all our pilots. 

 -- Have you seen any evidence of 'points abuse' in D1 Intermediate and
Advanced (the only places where it really counts)? In the 5 years I've been
flying pattern I don't think I have. In fact the results seem to indicate
the opposite- Guys that compete a lot and finish in the top of the class a
lot move up within a year or two. 

-- I suspect that, as MattK pointed out a couple days ago, the advent of the
4 year life /duration of AMA points effective this year, points will be even
less of an issue for the casual Intermediate  / Advanced guy. 

-- I can't believe that a guy can build / assemble / fly / maintain a
competitive 2meter pattern plane and be incapable of keeping his own points
count. 

 

I'll be happy to discuss AMA points counts with any D1 Intermediate or
Advanced guy who doesn't understand what the system's about or how to keep
points, and will gladly discuss (OFFLINE / OFFLIST) specifics with anyone
who wants to me to investigate whether one of our guys is homesteading in a
class. 

 

But I really am not in favor of activating a system to scrutinize all 39
(last year's count of total faces that flew in at least 1 D1 contest in
Intermediate / Advanced) of our Intermediate and Advanced pilots in hopes of
catching a sandbagger. Let's focus on having FUN with our toy airplanes --
and deal with suspected exceptions as exceptions. I have no problem at all
with talking to individuals about how this part of the system works. 

 

Thanks for listening - 

 

Anyone know a 'no-snow / no-wind' dance we can do to get some PRACTICE
weather here in the Northeast??? 

 

Rick 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of George Kennie
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 2:29 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Rules Changes----Advancement

 

I think that if the district CD's were required to include the placement of
"ALL" competitors(not just the first 3 places, but everyone in the class) in
every class when submitting contest reports to the DVP for inclusion in the
K-Factor, then it should be a relatively simple task to keep track of
accrued totals for the season, at the end of which it could be reported in
the K-Factor exactly who had pointed out in each class.The DVP's
responsibility could be considered fulfilled at that point and have no
further requirement to mandate any advancement demands on the individuals
involved as their peer group would, in all probability, implement that role.

Watcha think??? No good????? 
G. 
P.S. If the CD's will commit to it, I'd be willing to do the math for D1. 

Atwood, Mark wrote: 

    

I guess I'm going to recuse myself from this discussion as a lot of this has
never really made sense to me.  I was never able to console myself from
losing a contest by thinking."hmmm.that guy that beat me really should have
already moved up."  Nor did I feel any tremendous since of accomplishment
when after finishing 2nd all year to someone.I was suddenly finishing 1st
because that person was flying a higher class. 

 

I will say this though.regardless of what "rule" WILL be in place.there are
rules in place now.  There should be a discussion along side this thread
about enforcement.  I think I'm a proponent of NO rule, simply because
that's effectively what we have in practice today.  

  

We have only a small handful of scoring systems in place, all of which could
produce a simple extract file with participants/AMA #/Class/placing,
etc.that could be submitted to an NSRCA rep for import into a central
database.  I know.I'm not volunteering either.Lol. 

  

-Mark 

 

  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050310/beafe728/attachment.html