Another box rule (discussion)

Jim Ivey jivey61 at bellsouth.net
Tue Mar 8 08:17:08 AKST 2005


Naww Nat, Just keep on buying glasses like I am going to do.

Jim Ivey
> 
> From: "Nat Penton" <natpenton at centurytel.net>
> Date: 2005/03/08 Tue PM 12:10:11 EST
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: Another box rule (discussion)
> 
> Buddy, you are cruis'in for a brusin. I would like the 'limited vision' option though <G>. Thought I'd get this in before you got cut off again!!           Nat
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: BUDDYonRC at aol.com 
>   To: discussion at nsrca.org 
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 10:18 AM
>   Subject: Another box rule (discussion)
> 
> 
>     
>   There seems to be valid reasons to not change the present pattern box.
>   There are also two seemingly valid questions / problems that the present box arrangement presents.
>   1. Pilots flying optimum distance out increase the chance of mid air collision.
>   2. Pilots who are somewhat vision limited who would prefer to fly closer in.
>   A possible solution would be to revise the box rules to allow a person who in advance of his flight accepts a 2% total flight score downgrade to fly in closer and violate the 60 degree box lines without further downgrade.
>   How about some comments and opinions and any other ideas which would address these issues. 
>   Please don't boot me off of the list again I'm just trying to do my Job.
>   Buddy
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>   Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>   Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>   Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reply
Type: null
Size: 0 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050308/eb8a89f3/reply.ksh


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list