Pattern Box Rules (discussion)

[Del K. Rykert]

I know that making it more difficult does and has hurt contest attendance. 
Was that the intent? of course not but many  changes aren't being considered 
for the negative they will create as well as the positive the are shooting 
for.

        Del
  nsrca - 473

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Ferrell" <johnferrell at earthlink.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: Pattern Box Rules (discussion)


> Paul, don't get the idea I am hostile, I am just picking on the troops 
> with this one!
>
> I feel guilty of at least helping us down this road of dwindling 
> membership since I was chair of the rules survey committee when we chose 
> to make the sequences tougher.
>
> There is no assurance that less demanding sequences at the lower levels 
> will fix the problem but what can it hurt?
>
> John Ferrell
> http://DixieNC.US
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Paul Horan" <phoran at vvm.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Pattern Box Rules (discussion)
>
>
>>    As a new competitor, just out of Sportsman, I actually like the box.
>> It sure beats blasting back and forth like we used to back in the 70s and 
>> 80s.
>> Also the box instills a dicipline that I find challanging but enjoyable. 
>> I think
>> we would be losing something important if we eliminated the box.
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.