Landing Direction; Spins, and Snaps. . .

[Verne Koester]

Bob,
I think your scenario is the hidden place where real time is saved, 
particularly on pavement where the idle has to be very low to keep the plane 
from rolling forward a little prior to takeoff. Last weekend in Muncie, over 
125 takeoffs occurred on Saturday over the course of 4 rounds. I don't 
recall a single instance where a plane quit out on the line and had to be 
brought in and restarted. It's been pointed out that there are other rules 
changes could accomplish the same thing and that's true. Right now, I'm just 
watching and trying to assess what's good and what's bad about the rules in 
place at the moment. My general perception after just one contest on 
pavement is that things seemed to go quicker and safer under the conditions 
we were flying in. There are many more contests to observe before the full 
impact can be truly evaluated.

Verne


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Richards" <bob at toprudder.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Landing Direction; Spins, and Snaps. . .


>I have really been trying to stay out of the "scoring
> TO and Landings" discussion since I voiced my opinion
> way back when. However, I will add some real-world
> data regarding time savings.
>
> During one round at the '93 Nats, I had an engine that
> would not idle down without cutting off. I did
> eventually get airborne, but ended up zeroing the
> flight since I took 10 seconds over the required time
> to get airborne. I understand the time limit is to
> keep things moving, but in this case it did anything
> but. I flew the whole flight, and the judges judged
> the whole flight, the scribes wrote down every score.
> It was not until I landed that I found out the round
> was zeroed, and only because I saw the scribes erasing
> the scores. It wasted a lot of people's time.
>
> The line judge should have immediately told me to stop
> and let the next contestant fly, but I think he was
> doing everything he could to be fair and wanted to
> double check the rules. In fact, since I did get
> airborne and was only 10 seconds over, he was going to
> let it go until someone else not even flying in my
> class complained.
>
> This whole episode was a bad experience for several
> people, and would have been avoided entirely and saved
> a LOT of time if the takeoff had not been scored.
>
> I learned to land/takeoff very well LONG before I
> started flying pattern. However, I understand the
> viewpoint of others, and I can see the point of
> requiring scored takeoffs/landings in Sportsman and
> Intermediate, much the way Novice used to have
> straight flight out/back scored. It is an element that
> is important and should be learned early.
>
> FWIW.
>
> Bob R.
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.