[SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Three blade size

Rodney Tanner rodney19821982 at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 11 12:29:30 AKDT 2005


I am currently using 15x13 APC wide 3B on my OS 140RXs. 7,800 RPM, ES pipe, 15% nitro. I find it a lot slower and smoother, than the 17x12 2B, in calm conditions. When the wind gets up I go back to the 2B.
 
Rodney Tanner. 

Bob Pastorello <rcaerobob at cox.net> wrote:
The 13 pitch three blade is too much for the OS 1.60.  It works, but it's straining a bit on 15%.  Might be fine with 20 or 25% nitro; never tried different fuel.  The 16 x 11 GRS three blade sounds pretty interesting, Wayne.  May have to borrow yours to find out.......... :-)

Bob Pastorello
www.rcaerobats.net
rcaerobob at cox.net
----- Original Message ----- 
From: wgalligan 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 1:12 AM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Three blade size


I dont think it would be enough load for that much engine.
I would think a 15.75x13 APC 3 blade would load the OS 1.60 better. 
 
WG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mike Hester 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Three blade size


The Mejlik 16x11 was AWESOME on the 160fx, best prop by far. Just a bit loud. I think I'll try one of these Cleveland 16x11s and see what the difference is.
 
-Mike
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mark Hunt 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Three blade size


That is notable....3 blades instead of two and yet one ounce lighter than the apc!
 
Sounds like a good prop for the 160fx??
 
Mark
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Wayne Galligan 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: Three blade size


Something different.   Look like clones.    But I think for less $$
This 16x11 3 blade has good performance and is noticeably slower then the 17x12 2-blade APC.   
The 3 blade 16x11 is one ounce lighter then the 17x12 APC also.
 
Wayne G
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mike Hester 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Three blade size


Those look a LOT like Mejlik props, wierdly enough even the sizing is the same. What's up with that?
 
Anyway I have a Mejlik 16x11 I tested yesterday. It has an extremely wide blade root and a 120 cut  TT was too small to fit. Also the hole Dia is 3/8 so a bushing would need to be used on a 140. I can say this...it's louder than the APC, but it's PERFECT in performance.
 
So are these Mejlik clones or are they something different?
 
-Mike
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Wayne Galligan 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: Three blade size


Cleveland props does make a c.fiber 16x11  and I am using one on my OS 1.40 and I like it.
 
see this link:
 
http://pages.prodigy.net/gcleveland_grsmodels/_import/pages.prodigy.net/gcleveland_grsmodels/index6.html
 
Wayne Galligan
----- Original Message ----- 
From: randy10926 at comcast.net 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: Three blade size


I wish they made a 3 blade 16X11
 
-------------- Original message -------------- 
Does anyone make a three blade 16 x 10 ?

Bob Pastorello
www.rcaerobats.net
rcaerobob at cox.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050611/248641c9/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list