Rule Change Proposal

[Keith Hoard]

What is the quickest way to get this in print?  Obviously using common sense
concerning this won't work. . .

 
 
Keith L. Hoard
Cordova, TN
khoard at midsouth.rr.com
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Cameron Smith
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:04 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: Rule Change Proposal

YES SIR, SIR!
 Don't want a horse head in my bed!

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:57 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Rule Change Proposal


On Jun 9, 2005, at 8:44 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:

> Knowing the wind conditions of the day you speak of I agree.
>  Safety of the aircraft & Runway environment should be the priority.
> It's a shame to sacrifice the plane for the sake of a 10 on a K1
> Maneuver.
>
>  (Boy this will start something; sure glad The Florida Mafia started
> it!)

There probably aren't many around who will remember that the rule 
change to make takeoff direction the pilot's option was VERY difficult 
to pass.  It took three proposals to get it through the Contest Board.  
I was the proposer then too.  I am also a member of the Florida Mafia.  
Our motto is' "Do it our way or else!"

Ron Van Putte

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org 
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:30 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Rule Change Proposal
>
> I'd like to float a rule change proposal for consideration and
> discussion.
>
> After recently attending a contest in which landing downwind was very
> difficult and dangerous, I thought there should be a rule change
> regarding the landing direction.  Off the top of my head, I'd say
> something like, "In case of a wind shift during the flight and to
> reduce the hazard to people and the aircraft, subject to the approval
> of the judges, the landing direction is the pilot's option."
>
> Comments?
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to 
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
> list.
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to 
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
list.

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.



=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.