[SPAM] Re: New Sequences

[Rodney Tanner]

Bill, Mike: 
I see the argument for a smoother transition between 402 and 403 and in the context of the overall progression through the classes it is probably a valid one, especially for the Intermediate guy coming up. Personally, though,  I am glad for the leap I am going through in the current 403 - Advanced  and can´t wait to go up to Masters, which I now see as more of a logical step up, rather than the big, intentional, leap it will be in the future. 
Good job guys.
 
Rodney 

Mike Hester <kerlock at comcast.net> wrote:
What Bill said.

We had 2 choices to smooth out that huge leap between 402 and 403: make 402 
tougher or make 403 slightly easier. The overwhelming majority was against 
making 402 any tougher, so we went this way. Like Bill said, look at the 
schedules in relation to each other and consider that carefully before 
anyone votes on them. There are a couple of ways we could end up with a 
worse problem than we currently have. My hope is everyone will put a lot of 
thought into their choices. I'm reminded of teh old knight at the end of 
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade....."choose wisely". Look what happened 
to the guy that picked the wrong one. Eek.

-Mike
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Pritchett" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 8:03 PM
Subject: New Sequences


> Rodney:
> Both proposed Advanced schedules are "easier" than the current Advanced 
> schedule. This was one of the criteria that we worked with, based upon 
> overwhelming opinion that the jump to Advanced is currently too much. I 
> like both schedules (not because I'm on the committee...hehe), but what 
> this WILL do is make the jump to Masters much bigger for the guys that 
> will come through these schedules. I am sort of a victim of having made 
> the current jump, and now that I've made it, felt that I could objectively 
> help others coming up in seasons to come not deal with some of the issues 
> current Advanced flyers have had to handle. Our current schedule calls 
> for 10 maneuvers prior to a cross box turnaround. Although there is 
> discussion on the list right now about being on that "line", and a cross 
> box being a bother, let's face it, most Advanced flyers need to adjust 
> in/out earlier than 10 maneuvers in. Lots of thought and discussion went 
> into these, and I'm sure that everyone on the committee hopes that the 
> NSRCA membership takes a deep collective breath before making any 
> judgments. One thing we all tried to do is make it more even in jumps 
> between classes, up to Masters. We all seemed to agree that Masters 
> should be the "big" jump, and a jump that provides a class of 
> "Destination" for some, and FAI prep for others. I hope that you, and 
> others, will look at the proposed Advanced schedule as a part of the 
> whole, and not a direct comparison to the present.
> Thanks
> Bill
>
>
> Bill Pritchett
> 765-744-9322
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
> 


=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050609/8169cfc9/attachment.html