[SPAM] Re: Flying the new sequences

Ed Hartley roho2 at rcpattern.com
Tue Jun 7 20:02:07 AKDT 2005


Hi Troy,

They are on the site now......

Ed

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Troy A. Newman" <troy_newman at msn.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:55 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Flying the new sequences


> Terry and list members,
>
> You have not found them because they were not for publication. Rather they
> were in a "drafted form" waiting for approval.
> A couple of people could not hold their tea for a few days until the 
> product
> was ready for release. The result is there are some that know and some 
> that
> don't. That is now changed. Anyone that wants them can get them from the
> NSRCA site. They should be up in a day or two.
>
> The plan was to have a meeting of the minds in the NSRCA Board and then 
> the
> product would be released to the membership. Since the Cat is out of the
> bag, and nothing was intended to be a secret in the first place....The
> sequences will be posted on the NSRCA website in the next day or so. These
> have been flown by lots of pilots of different skill levels all over the
> country. Anyone that wants copies can have them and distribute as they see
> fit. These are only proposals. They are not set in stone and are not
> approved for the 2007 contest seasons. They are subject to change.
>
> As of now all I have consistently is email. My computer is toast. This is
> suppose to change on Friday with a new computer. I can answer questions in
> the mean time. Please be patient. There was a plan of action. That plan of
> action was the June 15th KF deadline. Everything is do to the editor on 
> that
> day. The gun got jumped by a couple weeks with some anxious people that
> could not wait until that day. The reason for the June 15th deadline being
> after the product was submitted to the board was to fix errors and 
> problems
> with the product. I think we have things in pretty good shape. Not to say 
> a
> change may not happen...just that they are solid in the current form. 
> Errors
> can and do slip through the cracks.
>
> So to all that are interested give the Web managers for the NSRCA some 
> time
> to get the documents up and going online. They have been released for
> publication as of now.
>
>
> I want to thank the folks that helped work on this project.
>
> Sportsman: Mark Hunt, Bruce Reins, Jerry Stebbins, Tom Simes
>
> Intermediate: John Pavlick, Scott Smith, Michael Laggis, Pete Cosky, Randy
> Hatfield
>
> Advanced: Mike Hester, Bill Pritchett, Chris White, Tim Taylor, Jarvis
> Johnson
>
> Masters: Bob Pastorello, Dave Lockhart, Joe Lachowski, Arch Stafford, Ed
> Alt, Charlie Rock
>
> My thanks go to these guys for the ideas. I just tried to compile the
> results the best I could. We hope you all are happy with the sequences.
> go to:
> www.nsrca.org
>
> There will be call sheets up, and then over the weekend hopefully the
> Aresti, and detailed descriptors will follow.
>
> Troy A. Newman
> NSRCA Sequence Proposal Committee Chair
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Terry Clendennen" <tclendennen at hot.rr.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>
>
>> I still haven't found these new sequences.Where are they?
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:58 PM
>> Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Bob Kane wrote:
>>
>> > I'm having more trouble with the slow roll after the
>> > figure 9 . . . . . . .
>>
>> Hmmm, I must be getting better.  I haven't had a problem with that one
>> either.  I WAS having trouble with the 1/4, 1/2, 1/4 Roll until I
>> realized that I wasn't putting in enough rudder on the first point and
>> was trying to roll too fast.
>>
>> Ron Van Putte
>>
>> >
>> > --- Grow Pattern <pattern4u at comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> It is a tough maneuver to draw correctly in the sky.
>> >> That's why it is in at the level I guess. In FAI
>> >> they throw in a couple of 1/2 rolls to use up your
>> >> 45 degree lines.
>> >>
>> >> On a different subject. Is anyone finding it hard to
>> >> present the reverse knife-edge after the top hat in
>> >> masters this year?
>> >>
>> >> Eric.
>> >>   ----- Original Message -----
>> >>   From: John Ferrell
>> >>   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> >>   Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:50 AM
>> >>   Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>   It sounds pretty tricky. If the first radius on
>> >> the push is not the "right amount" the line
>> >> length/cross is bunged.
>> >>
>> >>   Like the figure M, it is merciful there are only
>> >> 10 points to lose!
>> >>
>> >>   John Ferrell
>> >>   http://DixieNC.US
>> >>
>> >>     ----- Original Message -----
>> >>     From: Grow Pattern
>> >>     To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> >>     Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:08 AM
>> >>     Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>     A golf ball is more akin to the current P-05
>> >> "Goldfish" standing on end. An ice-cream cone has
>> >> much steeper sides and ends in a point at center.
>> >> The golf ball has a cross-over point at center of
>> >> the two straight 45 degree equal length lines.
>> >>
>> >>     FAI describes it as - Golf ball from top:  Push
>> >> to a 45 degree downline, pull through ¾ of an inside
>> >> loop to a 45 degree upline and push to recover
>> >> upright.
>> >>
>> >>     Regards,
>> >>
>> >>     Eric.
>> >>       ----- Original Message -----
>> >>       From: Wincons at aol.com
>> >>       To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> >>       Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:05 AM
>> >>       Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>       In a message dated 6/6/2005 11:03:17 P.M.
>> >> Central Daylight Time, patterndude at comcast.net
>> >> writes:
>> >>         The golf ball should really be named the ice
>> >> cream cone, but it wouldn't fit on the call sheets
>> >> easily.  In this case it's a 45 degree downline, a
>> >> 1/2 loop, a 45 degree upline back to center.  Now
>> >> help me with a spring coil!!!!
>> >>         --Lance
>> >>       Maybe 270 degrees 3/4 loop, not 180 deg
>> >> half-loop?
>> >>
>> >>       Brian ;)
>> >
>> >
>> > Bob Kane
>> > getterflash at yahoo.com
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________
>> > Do You Yahoo!?
>> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > =================================================
>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> > To be removed from this list, go to 
>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> > and follow the instructions.
>> >
>> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>> > list.
>> >
>>
>> ================To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
> list.
>>
>>
>>
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
> list.
>>
>>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list