[SPAM] Re: failed deliveries

Troy A. Newman troy_newman at msn.com
Mon Jul 25 20:39:53 AKDT 2005


troy_newman at msn.com



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Kennie" <geobet at gis.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 8:23 PM
Subject: failed deliveries


> Guys,
> I e-mailed my order of finish to all who requested it but got the 
> following undeliverable responses from the server:
>
> POSTMASTER at gis.net wrote:
>
>> When trying to deliver your message, the mail server at gis.net 
>> encountered
>> permanent problems with the following addresses:
>> For <flyinbill at bellsouth.net>, the destination server said: Invalid 
>> recipient: <flyinbill at bellsouth.net> (from bellsouth.net:205.152.59.33)
>> For <troynewman at msn.com>, the destination server said: Requested action 
>> not taken: mailbox unavailable (from msn.com:65.54.190.7)
>> For <tom.koenig at actewagl.au>, could not look up destination domain 
>> (actewagl.au), invalid domain name
>>
>>   --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Reporting-MTA: dns; gis.net
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<flyinbill at bellsouth.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 5.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid recipient: <flyinbill at bellsouth.net> 
>> (from bellsouth.net:205.152.59.33)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Vicenterc at comcast.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from 
>> comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<troynewman at msn.com>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 5.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox 
>> unavailable (from msn.com:65.54.190.7)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Patternrules at earthlink.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 1dX9im5zO3Nl3491 Message accepted for delivery 
>> (from earthlink.net:209.86.93.226)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<ronlock at comcast.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from 
>> comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 
>> 20050725201130.CEHQ24218.imta07ps.mx.bigpond.com at gis.net (from 
>> bigpond.com:144.140.80.13)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<tom.koenig at actewagl.au>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 5.1.2
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 512X could not look up destination domain 
>> (actewagl.au), invalid domain name
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<jasonshulman at cox.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 
>> 20050725201115.QBVG17201.lakermgxi02.cox.net at gis.net (from 
>> cox.net:68.1.17.3)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Don.ramsey at cox.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 
>> 20050725201115.QBVG17201.lakermgxi02.cox.net at gis.net (from 
>> cox.net:68.1.17.3)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<davel322 at comcast.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from 
>> comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<dflynt at verizon.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 2.5.0 Ok. (from verizon.net:206.46.232.11)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<rwantz2 at comcast.net>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from 
>> comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<piloto37 at cfl.rr.com>
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 2.5.0
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 2.0.0 j6PKBCdM029146 Message accepted for 
>> delivery (from cfl.rr.com:66.75.160.11)
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>>
>>   --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: unofficial numbers.
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:26 -0400
>> From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
>> Organization: None
>> To: flyinbill at bellsouth.net, Vicenterc at comcast.net,
>>      troynewman at msn.com, Patternrules at earthlink.net,
>>      ronlock at comcast.net
>> CC: pentagon.systems at bigpond.com, tom.koenig at actewagl.au,
>>      jasonshulman at cox.net, Don.ramsey at cox.net, davel322 at comcast.net
>>
>> I would like for everyone to be keenly aware that these results are
>> the resultant observations of a lone, solitary, unofficial critic
>> and represent only the OPINION of a singular individual and may not
>> represent the judgements of any other observer and bear no impact on
>> the actual results.
>>
>> Round             Quique          Don         Troy
>> Frak          Dave         Chip         Andrew          Todd
>>
>> 1                    1000             968.5       963.5
>> 950.25      946.9        946.9        910.4            897.2
>>
>> 2                     1000           1000         962.8
>> 937.4         945.9        939.1        937.4           942.5
>>
>> 3                     1000             929.7       947.3
>> 992.0         953.7        923.3        955.3           923.3
>>
>> 4                      1000            940.6          0
>> 894.7         921.9        881.2        937.2           932.1
>>
>> Totals              4000            3838.8      2873.6
>> 3774.35      3768.4       3690.5      3740.3        3695.1
>>
>> These numbers yield an order of finish as follows
>>
>> 1 Quique
>> 2 Don
>> 3 Frak
>> 4 Dave
>> 5 Andrew
>> 6 Todd
>> 7 Chip
>> 8 Troy
>>
>> As you can see, a case could probably be made regarding the
>> influence of a diamond studded halo, real or imagined.
>
>
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>
> 
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list