failed deliveries

George Kennie geobet at gis.net
Mon Jul 25 19:23:09 AKDT 2005


Guys,
I e-mailed my order of finish to all who requested it but got the following undeliverable responses from the server:

POSTMASTER at gis.net wrote:

> When trying to deliver your message, the mail server at gis.net encountered
> permanent problems with the following addresses:
> For <flyinbill at bellsouth.net>, the destination server said: Invalid recipient: <flyinbill at bellsouth.net> (from bellsouth.net:205.152.59.33)
> For <troynewman at msn.com>, the destination server said: Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (from msn.com:65.54.190.7)
> For <tom.koenig at actewagl.au>, could not look up destination domain (actewagl.au), invalid domain name
>
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Reporting-MTA: dns; gis.net
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<flyinbill at bellsouth.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid recipient: <flyinbill at bellsouth.net> (from bellsouth.net:205.152.59.33)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Vicenterc at comcast.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<troynewman at msn.com>
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (from msn.com:65.54.190.7)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Patternrules at earthlink.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 1dX9im5zO3Nl3491 Message accepted for delivery (from earthlink.net:209.86.93.226)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<ronlock at comcast.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201130.CEHQ24218.imta07ps.mx.bigpond.com at gis.net (from bigpond.com:144.140.80.13)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<tom.koenig at actewagl.au>
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.2
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 512X could not look up destination domain (actewagl.au), invalid domain name
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<jasonshulman at cox.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201115.QBVG17201.lakermgxi02.cox.net at gis.net (from cox.net:68.1.17.3)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Don.ramsey at cox.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201115.QBVG17201.lakermgxi02.cox.net at gis.net (from cox.net:68.1.17.3)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<davel322 at comcast.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<dflynt at verizon.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 2.5.0 Ok. (from verizon.net:206.46.232.11)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<rwantz2 at comcast.net>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<piloto37 at cfl.rr.com>
> Action: failed
> Status: 2.5.0
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 2.0.0 j6PKBCdM029146 Message accepted for delivery (from cfl.rr.com:66.75.160.11)
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
>
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: unofficial numbers.
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:26 -0400
> From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
> Organization: None
> To: flyinbill at bellsouth.net, Vicenterc at comcast.net,
>      troynewman at msn.com, Patternrules at earthlink.net,
>      ronlock at comcast.net
> CC: pentagon.systems at bigpond.com, tom.koenig at actewagl.au,
>      jasonshulman at cox.net, Don.ramsey at cox.net, davel322 at comcast.net
>
> I would like for everyone to be keenly aware that these results are
> the resultant observations of a lone, solitary, unofficial critic
> and represent only the OPINION of a singular individual and may not
> represent the judgements of any other observer and bear no impact on
> the actual results.
>
> Round             Quique          Don         Troy
> Frak          Dave         Chip         Andrew          Todd
>
> 1                    1000             968.5       963.5
> 950.25      946.9        946.9        910.4            897.2
>
> 2                     1000           1000         962.8
> 937.4         945.9        939.1        937.4           942.5
>
> 3                     1000             929.7       947.3
> 992.0         953.7        923.3        955.3           923.3
>
> 4                      1000            940.6          0
> 894.7         921.9        881.2        937.2           932.1
>
> Totals              4000            3838.8      2873.6
> 3774.35      3768.4       3690.5      3740.3        3695.1
>
> These numbers yield an order of finish as follows
>
> 1 Quique
> 2 Don
> 3 Frak
> 4 Dave
> 5 Andrew
> 6 Todd
> 7 Chip
> 8 Troy
>
> As you can see, a case could probably be made regarding the
> influence of a diamond studded halo, real or imagined.




=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list