Composite-ARF Impact question
Bill Southwell
bnbsouthwell at bellsouth.net
Mon Jan 31 16:25:21 AKST 2005
Sounds like a twisted stab to me. If it has gotten a bit hot in
transit with any torsion it would twist. I have heard stories of fellows
leaving the airplane in the van on a hot day and it had something
pushing on the fuse.....it cools over night and walaaa instant flying
bannana. It could also be a bad mold but hey, I am sure, as some are to
so eager to point out, that our offshore suppliers are incapable of
having a less than perfect quality product. Now if the kit had been
produced in the states the warp would have been the first and loudest
possibility....Gee, I just slipped my nomex suit on so flame away. :>)
My guess is that heat and pressure induced a ahh ..modification to the
fuse and is the source of the off set fin. Besides I doubt the
manufacture would miss a chance for a " great new feature" to not have
used it in the ad copy if it were intentional.....
Bill "call me charcoal now" Southwell
Iuka,MS
Adam Quennoz wrote:
> I've done some more investigating. I traced the outline of the
> airfoil on top of the v. stab on a piece of paper. It is
> symmetrical. Now the kicker.... I drew a centerline on the top of
> the stab. Then stood behind the plane and sighted down the line I
> made. It pointed WAY off to the left. So there is definately
> something going on with the vertical stab. I still can't figure out
> if it's a design feature or a mistake. I guess the question to ask is
> if anyone out there flying this plane notice any difficulty in
> trimming or anything out of the ordinary while trimming? I'm also
> curious what Jason Shulman has to say about this. Does he know it is
> there?
>
> Regards,
> Adam Q
>
> Bill Glaze wrote:
>
>>
>> As I recall, this thread started because of one flyer noticing the
>> asymmetrical airfoil on his new fuselage. While certainly not
>> original in aviation, I must admit that I've not seen this before in
>> the modeling world. Or, probably, it's just that I've not noticed it
>> before. I sure hope he keeps us updated as to how it works in the
>> real world of modeling.
>>
>> Bill Glaze
>>
>> Bob Richards wrote:
>>
>>> Bill,
>>>
>>> I don't think it is uncommon for full-scale planes to have offset or
>>> asymmetrical fins. However, they are designed with the right amount
>>> *for cruise*. Any other speed/power setting will change things.
>>> Since they are after the most efficiency in cruise conditions
>>> (better range), they will probably want the least amount of offset
>>> thrust as possible, and will trim the rudder/fin accordingly. If
>>> they expect the fin to be providing a constant yaw force, it would
>>> make sense to give it an asymmetrical airfoil for the most
>>> efficiency. Let the pilots deal with the other situations.
>>>
>>> I personally think the right-thrust is the correct way to go. I
>>> can't argue with what others have said about throttle mix working
>>> for them, but I don't see how it would work. I think you will have
>>> less slipstream effect happening at full throttle in level flight
>>> than you would at full throttle in a climb. As the prop unloads with
>>> increasing airspeed, the slipstream effect should decrease.
>>>
>>> Of course, I remember the very detailed trim instructions that came
>>> with my Great Planes Cap21. Something like: "Pull the nose up until
>>> pefectly vertical. If the plane yaws off to the left, add weight to
>>> the right wingtip". There was no mention ANYWHERE about engine
>>> thrust. Tossed that in the trash. :-)
>>>
>>> Bob R.
>>>
>>> */Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>/* wrote:
>>>
>>> Adam:
>>> This may be a little bit off the mark, but just a little bit.
>>> During
>>> WW2, the Italian firm Fiat produced a very good series of
>>> fighters with
>>> exactly the characteristics you mention, that is, an asymmetrical
>>> fin/rudder airfoil. Seemed to work well for them; other nations
>>> handled
>>> the problem differently.
>>> Bill Glaze
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bob Richards
>>> bob at toprudder.com
>>> http://www.toprudder.com
>>
>>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list