No fixed tips?

[Troy A. Newman]

They don't fly the same....and the aileron thru the tip thing wears out servo pots faster. I flew a model this past summer and it went thru aileron servo pots in 50 flights. I normally get well over 100-125 flights. And this was a wood model so the vibration was better damped than a composite fuse.

Wing tips have lots of turbulence coming off of them...then stick a aileron in this turbulence. NOPE not the best from an engineering standpoint. 

The answer guys and manufacturers give is it snaps better. My answer is design a good wing and it will snap better. Copy a good wing and it will snap better.  The ailerons become more effective with the area at the tip....but I don't feel it helps flight performance. Aileron thru the tip is much easier and faster to build than a boxed in version. on the ARFy stuff its cheaper...this is the biggest reason I think its done.

As for elevators without tips there are no references. And the same things apply

All my models have them boxed and will have them boxed in.

Troy
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tim Taylor 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 7:46 AM
  Subject: No fixed tips?


  No fixed tips at the end of the wing/stab seems to be the rage. Any real reason for this? I really don't care for this very much as it makes it harder to make sure your trim is right and the elev half's meet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050130/fd0d8f6a/attachment.html