* del klipped * Re: [SPAM] Re: Re: Class Structure - 400S

[Del Rykert]

Dave is of course correct many local contest can't support 4 classes 
anymore. 1 and 2 in a class I don't call support of that class..My 
definition

    del

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Lockhart" <DaveL322 at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:30 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Re: Class Structure - 400S


> Bob,
>
> You are not alone.
>
> I'm not sure why we would want to add another class at this time - It is 
> not
> like there are 10 guys in each class at every contest - seems to me the
> numbers we have wouldn't support 6 classes.
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <rcaerobob at cox.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Class Structure - 400S
>
>
>> EVERY time we have a rules change/cycle pending, and we start discussing
> what to do....SOMEBODY says "Add another Class".
>> It is obvious that I am the only person who sees how incredibly
> dis-serving this would be...no one else has spoken up!!!
>>
>> The main reason that "extra classes" get suggested, is because we have
> never had the chutzpa to get together in real consensus and build the 
> class
> transistions properly.  I remember when Verne had his set.  I remember 
> when
> we had a couple of pretty good schdules set up a few cycles back...BOOM.
> Blown up because WE - not anyone else - cannot get our act together in
> dealing with the core issues.
>>
>> If we decide we need another entry class, then it should be crystal clear
> that there is something WRONG with the Sportsman sequence, and that has
> happened because we had to make Intermediate more difficult so there
> wouldn't be this chasm to leap into Advanced, which we made more difficult
> because of the HUGE-er chasm into Masters!!!!!
>>
>> DOES NO ONE ELSE - REALLY - SEE this but ME ?????
>> Ya'll gotta tell me, because if I am an "Army of One", I'll just go away,
> and let ya'll figger out fer yerselves.
>>
>> SOMEBODY tell me.....straight up!!!
>>
>> BOb Pastorello
>> (Having a MONDAY at the salt mine!!!!!!!!!!!)
>> >
>> > From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
>> > Date: 2005/01/10 Mon PM 12:54:15 EST
>> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> > Subject: Re: Re: Class Structure - 400S
>> >
>> > Yes like SPA.
>> >
>> > I am a big fan of SPA but it has one thing that does not work that well
> for
>> > me.  That is the planes flown.
>> >
>> > The 400S class would use current models, if the pilot so desired. Of
> course
>> > the older designs might well prove to competitive again - how cunning 
>> > of
> me
>> > to even suggest that. Also the age of the pilot is not really a rule.
>> >
>> > The 400S class  would find its own level just like water.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Eric.
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Jim Ivey" <jivey61 at bellsouth.net>
>> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:41 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Re: Class Structure - 400S
>> >
>> >
>> > > Eric
>> > > As in SPA.......
>> > >
>> > > Jim Ivey
>> > >>
>> > >> From: "Grow Pattern" 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.