Reverse Avalanche Poll Result
Jim Ivey
jivey61 at bellsouth.net
Thu Jan 13 04:56:50 AKST 2005
Yeah, Nat, I think he's sandbagging, don't you?
Jim Ivey
>
> From: "Nat Penton" <natpenton at centurytel.net>
> Date: 2005/01/13 Thu AM 12:11:38 EST
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: Reverse Avalanche Poll Result
>
> In 90 days Bob P will be flying the reverse avalanche, scoring 8s, 9s, 10s, and wondering why he ever had doubts !!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Pavlick
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 10:41 PM
> Subject: RE: Reverse Avalanche Poll Result
>
>
> Bob,
> Brilliant. You're in for it now... You do realize that you sent this to "the list" don't you?
> John Pavlick
> http://www.idseng.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bob Pastorello
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:42 PM
> To: NSRCA
> Subject: Reverse Avalanche Poll Result
>
>
> We all (Masters) could just skip the thing.
>
> This eliminates any question of risk to equipment, and the possibility that the maneuver will influence the outcomes of contests (as all would be scored ZERO).
>
> There aren't that many of us, and if we all agreed, it could work...
>
> Is this too crazy to work??? Or just too "anarchist" ?
>
> Bob Pastorello
> NSRCA 199 AMA 46373
> rcaerobob at cox.net
> www.rcaerobats.net
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reply
Type: null
Size: 0 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050113/9bbcf2d2/reply.ksh
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list