adding interest and complexity to Sportsman ... again and again
and
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sat Jan 8 22:23:23 AKST 2005
Sportsman needs to be maintained as the entry class to Pattern events and
overcomplicating it will not be a step in the right direction. I feel same as
Steve that it's about right in complexity. I would add that it should remain
unchanged for a consiiderable amount of time (pick a period--10 years is a
nice round number)
Rationale for long time period before changes (if ever): Pilots seldom stay
in the class more than two years so the ones that move on, see a fresh
schedule regardless. The ones that drop, well, it makes little difference to them.
It would serve virtually no purpose to change this schedule
Rationale for keeping the sequence "simple": A friend of mine has tried to
get into pattern competition for a couple years now. He is a very good sport
flier, can 3D his 1/3 scale aerobats just fine and knows some construction
technique, engine maintenance and radio diagnostics already.
But the demands of pattern planes are different and he has had to overcome
several issues. After a couple of years of frustration and perseverence, he
has started to practice in earnest. He has commented to me how difficult the
"simple" Sportsman schedule is. I admire his perseverence; most would have
quit.
Point is, many Sportsmen face alot issues with fundamentals that the other
classes have learned to overcome. Their learning curve is vertical already.
Lets leave the complicated stuff for the higher classes. The Sportsmen who move
on, will see that soon enough.
MattK
In a message dated 1/9/2005 12:29:00 AM Eastern Standard Time,
rcsteve at tcrcm.org writes:
I have to agree with John here. I'm concerned that we keep making the
entry-level class too hard for the real newbie that we are trying to hook.
I flew my first contest 7 months after solo. This was back in about 1997 or
so. The individual manuevers were no easier, but you got to go out of the
box pretty frequently and get lined back up. For someone that isn't that
skilled (people we need to bring into the entry ranks to fill the pipe), after a
couple maneuvers, they get behind the airplane and are going into the next
maneuver in trouble. Leaving the box gave us the opportunity to calm down and
get straightened out.
If your skills were better than that, start in Intermediate. Same message
today to those that think Sportsman is too easy. It should be really easy!
Sportsman should be constructed so that regular club sport flyers can come
taste pattern with little or no practice when the local club holds a meet with
their 4 star 40's and Tiger 60's.
This year, I tried to bring a couple of our yearling's into our local
contest. They just couldn't handle the continuity of it all, and both gave up. Oh
we could be elitist and say they should have practiced more and got better
airplanes, but is that really going to seed the pipe?
Maybe what we need is another (non-rated?) entry class? Fun-pattern class
or something?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050109/379d08bf/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list