adding interest and complexity to Sportsman ... again and again
and
Dean Pappas
d.pappas at kodeos.com
Thu Jan 6 11:57:22 AKST 2005
Hey George,
When the wind blows, even a little bit, the present Sportsman schedule overtaxes both the concentration and skill of the entry level pilot.
A certain amount of this is good, 'cause all real learning is painful, but this is a trap that the event has fallen into at least four times in my recollection.
We keep changing schedules to maintain interest, and that's good.
When we revise the schedules, we keep adding interest: that sounds good, but what we really almost always ended up doing was adding a tiny bit of complexity until ...
We have to add a new class to the all-important bottom of the pyramid.
Want to know how many times it's happened? Once it was called Novice, then we called it Pre-Novice, then the schedules all changed,
and we called it Novice again, then we changed the name to Sportsman, and added Turnaround.
I like the schedule Don proposes, but I'd rather have the Sportsmen fly two short schedules with a "holy cow!, let me get back from the next county." break between the schedules.
Some Sportsmen go without a breath for a whole schedule. Okay that's a slight exageration.
I have used the out-of-box time between those two schedules to coach, calm, and teach the incoming pilots. It's terribly useful.
Oh yes, 3 rolls is infinitely more useful for teaching "elevator timing" than 2. You can fake it for 2, but the 3rd one requires that the plane be under control after 2.
Hey Ron van Putte ... you out there?
Tell the man about the time the Earth shook in Lake Charles!
Regards,
Dean Pappas
Sr. Design Engineer
Kodeos Communications
111 Corporate Blvd.
South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
(908) 222-7817 phone
(908) 222-2392 fax
d.pappas at kodeos.com
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of George Kennie
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:37 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Annex proposal - development
I too find Don Ramsey's sequence very stimulating.
Reminds me that I have always felt that the poor guys in Sportsman sometimes appear to be getting the short end of the stick regarding the schedule.Many contests that I have attended have them flying the sequence twice because the routine is so very short. I would like to see their schedule slightly modified to give them a little longer sequence and a little additional stimulation.
I would propose something like the following.
1.T.O. U
2.Free Pass. D
3.Straight Flight Out. C U
4.Procedure Turn. T
5.Straight Flight Back. C D
6.1/2 Reverse Cuban Eight T
7.Immelman Turn. C U
8.Split S. T
9.2 Loops. C U
10.Exit The Box. U
11.Enter The Box. D
12.Non-Rolling Triangular Loop C U
13.Humpty Bump 1/2 roll up T
14.One 2-Point Roll C D
15.1/2 Cuban Eight. T
16.Non-Rolling Cobra. C U
17.Stall Turn. T
18.2 Rolls. C D
19.Exit The Box.
20.Landing. C U
C= Center,T=Turnaround, U= Upwind, D=Downwind.
My rationale is that this is the point that we need to encourage this
class of fliers to work on their down elevator timing by introducing
2 rolls.This shouldn't be too much for them to handle as they are
currently doing a 2 point roll. Also the 2 loops will sharpen their
precision by making them work harder at presentation placement.
The Procedure Turn will teach them something that will be required,
and the Humpty should present no major problems as they are already
doing a 1/2 Reverse Cuban.They should be learning the Stall Turn and
the Triangular Loop will further strengthen their centering skills.There are
seven maneuvers before taking a breather and seven more to complete
the sequence.
Now these fellows can fly ONE sequence like the rest of us and the
time required should be no longer than the time required to fly a double
schedule.
Sportsman pilots out there, let me know what you think.
Georgie
P.S.I wonder if there are any Sportsman guys monitoring this list??
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050106/d320a525/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list