Annex proposal
tony at radiosouthrc.com
tony at radiosouthrc.com
Thu Jan 6 06:59:01 AKST 2005
Joe:
The Annex WAS done last time!
Tony Stillman
Radio South
3702 N. Pace Blvd.
Pensacola, FL 32505
1-800-962-7802
www.radiosouthrc.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Lachowski" <jlachow at hotmail.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Annex proposal
> Ok. But if it is submitted, again. Have the Annex done already. This will
> show we mean it this time.
>
>>From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
>>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>Subject: Re: Annex proposal
>>Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:32:12 -0600
>>
>>
>>On Jan 5, 2005, at 6:45 AM, Joe Lachowski wrote:
>>
>>>It might have passed if it was written and ironed out before the proposal
>>>was submitted. It probably would have had a much better chance. The
>>>competition board would have at least had something to work with in
>>>making their decision.
>>
>>That's not true. The only way AMA would have accepted an annex proposal
>>was if AMA had veto power over the maneuver schedules. The original
>>proposal did not have that. The second proposal did give AMA veto power,
>>but didn't pass because one contest board member didn't vote.
>>
>>Ron Van Putte
>>
>>>
>>>>From: "Del Rykert" <drykert at localnet.com>
>>>>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>>>Subject: Re: Annex proposal
>>>>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:07:35 -0500
>>>>
>>>>It was tried to implement but shot down Terry.
>>>>
>>>> del
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Terry Brox
>>>> To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:44 PM
>>>> Subject: Annex proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is the real or perceived problem with the Annex system. I am not
>>>> an IMAC flier, but it looks like it works well for them.
>>>> I don't want to start a war here, but I am not sure why one would
>>>> have a problem with a system that could help alleviate the problems
>>>> associated with our current system. Lets hear both sides. Respectfully
>>>> Terry Brox
>>>
>>>
>>>=================================================
>>>To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>and follow the instructions.
>>>
>>
>>=================================================
>>To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>and follow the instructions.
>>
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list