Annex proposal

Joe Lachowski jlachow at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 6 06:03:27 AKST 2005


Ok. But if it is submitted, again. Have the Annex done already. This will 
show we mean it this time.

>From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To: discussion at nsrca.org
>Subject: Re: Annex proposal
>Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:32:12 -0600
>
>
>On Jan 5, 2005, at 6:45 AM, Joe Lachowski wrote:
>
>>It might have passed if it was written and ironed out before the proposal 
>>was submitted. It probably would have had a much better chance. The 
>>competition board would have at least had something to work with in making 
>>their decision.
>
>That's not true.  The only way AMA would have accepted an annex proposal 
>was if AMA had veto power over the maneuver schedules.  The original 
>proposal did not have that.  The second proposal did give AMA veto power, 
>but didn't pass because one contest board member didn't vote.
>
>Ron Van Putte
>
>>
>>>From: "Del Rykert" <drykert at localnet.com>
>>>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>>Subject: Re: Annex proposal
>>>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:07:35 -0500
>>>
>>>It was tried to implement but shot down Terry.
>>>
>>>     del
>>>
>>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>>   From: Terry Brox
>>>   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>   Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:44 PM
>>>   Subject: Annex proposal
>>>
>>>
>>>   What is the real or perceived problem with the Annex system. I am not 
>>>an IMAC flier, but it looks like it works well for them.
>>>   I don't want to start a war here, but I am not sure why one would have 
>>>a problem with a system that could help alleviate the problems associated 
>>>with our current system. Lets hear both sides. Respectfully Terry Brox
>>
>>
>>=================================================
>>To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>and follow the instructions.
>>
>
>=================================================
>To access the email archives for this list, go to
>http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>and follow the instructions.
>


=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list