Which Engine Should I use ???
Ihncheol Park
PatternFlyer at sbcglobal.net
Wed Jan 5 23:53:41 AKST 2005
Dan,
I would go with the 91FX rather than the 91Surpass II pump. Eddie used YS
91 prior to YS 110. 91FX does not have to run faster rpm.
If you have a perry pump, it will be better. If you like to work on the
plane a little more, go with a muffled tuned pipe.
There are several people using tuned piped setups for the Excelleron 90s.
My 91SX w/ tuned pipe setup may need some weight in the nose, but not sure
yet.
Ihncheol Park
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of Daniel J. Hamlett
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:20 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Which Engine Should I use ???
I am going to be putting together an Exceleron 90. I have 2 different
engine options. First is an OS FX91, second is an OS FS91 Surpass w/pump.
Both are NIB. I have flow previous planes with a different 91FRX. I am
good with engines so I am not worried about any finicky engine issues with
either one. I have 2 two meter planes right now. This plane is one that I
want to be able to get home from work, grab it and go. The 2 meter planes
take a little bit more preparation to get them going quickly. I want the
plane to fly well with a good power curve. I know that the 91FX will want
to be flown a little bit faster, but how much I don't know. Also would the
FS91 II Surpass be enough to fly the plane well. I will most likely be
flying the intermediate pattern next year, so it doesn't have to be oh my
God outrageous performance. But I don't want tit to be a dog either.
If there is anybody with any time on this plane that could shed some light
on the situation it would be greatly appreciated.
Dan
Dst. 1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050106/6ffb070d/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list