Annex proposal

[Terry Brox]

Can it not be proposed again?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Lachowski" <jlachow at hotmail.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: Annex proposal


> It might have passed if it was written and ironed out before the proposal
> was submitted. It probably would have had a much better chance. The
> competition board would have at least had something to work with in making
> their decision.
>
> >From: "Del Rykert" <drykert at localnet.com>
> >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> >Subject: Re: Annex proposal
> >Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:07:35 -0500
> >
> >It was tried to implement but shot down Terry.
> >
> >     del
> >
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Terry Brox
> >   To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >   Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:44 PM
> >   Subject: Annex proposal
> >
> >
> >   What is the real or perceived problem with the Annex system. I am not
an
> >IMAC flier, but it looks like it works well for them.
> >   I don't want to start a war here, but I am not sure why one would have
a
> >problem with a system that could help alleviate the problems associated
> >with our current system. Lets hear both sides. Respectfully Terry Brox
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>


=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.