Annex proposal

[Joe Lachowski]

It might have passed if it was written and ironed out before the proposal 
was submitted. It probably would have had a much better chance. The 
competition board would have at least had something to work with in making 
their decision.

>From: "Del Rykert" <drykert at localnet.com>
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: Annex proposal
>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:07:35 -0500
>
>It was tried to implement but shot down Terry.
>
>     del
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Terry Brox
>   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>   Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:44 PM
>   Subject: Annex proposal
>
>
>   What is the real or perceived problem with the Annex system. I am not an 
>IMAC flier, but it looks like it works well for them.
>   I don't want to start a war here, but I am not sure why one would have a 
>problem with a system that could help alleviate the problems associated 
>with our current system. Lets hear both sides. Respectfully Terry Brox


=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.