Sequence Poll Results
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sun Jan 2 15:47:33 AKST 2005
Here are a couple questions to think about:
Quick, in one second, how many TOP masters pilots can you think of?
How many TOP F3A?
Which is THE destination class for the TOP pilots in the country?
MattK
I have a little different take on this ( so what's new Ed ?? ) . We
currently subscribe to the theory that a person begins in Sportsman and they progress
to one of two "destination" classes, USA recognized Masters or world
recognized FAI. The current format and rules may not state that but in reality that
is what is implied. So we make the assumption that most if not all pattern
flyers have a goal to fly one of those two "destination" classes sooner or
later, or never if you look at how the numbers are dropping in pattern. I believe
all four AMA classes can be "destination" classes, I know I have said this
before and it was not well received. Frankly, there are those, myself
included, that may never reach a level of proficiency to win in Masters or FAI. I
moved up to Masters in late '02 for a change, not because I pointed out or won a
district championship, I wanted to challenge myself knowing full well that I
was giving up winning in Advanced occasionally to become the bottom of the
heap in Masters. Given the amount of time I can devote to practice, I can
accept that, for me personally flying pattern was never about wining, however, it
sure is nice to win on occasion. Years ago when I raced NHRA SS/L, my goal
or destination was not to become a top fuel dragster or funny car pilot. I was
quiet happy racing ( and winning ) in that "sportsman" class. My goal in my
work life was never to become CEO of company XYZ. I think we need to
recognize and accept the fact that as we have raised the bar in schedule complexity
AND equipment requirements, many have realized they cannot compete at the
highest levels of our sport OR just plain do not wish too. Part of the reason
folks cannot or do not strive to compete at the Masters and/or FAI level is the
amount of resources required ( both time and $$ but more time ) to even fly,
let alone compete at that level. Not every one that competes wants to be
Chip Hyde, I'd dare to say most are just looking to challenge themselves.
Ed M.
----- Original Message -----
From: _Bob Pastorello_ (mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net)
To: _discussion at nsrca.org_ (mailto:discussion at nsrca.org)
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Sequence Poll Results
Thanks, Mark and Verne. Two sides of the core issue. Since I raised the
initial question, and Ed/Tony put out the poll....I thought perhaps I'd
summarize my rationale.
Masters is THE top class in AMA Pattern. That is what our National
Competition is about. In my thinking, it SHOULD stand as separate, and
unique/different in it's skill requirements than FAI.
Mark, you wrote that FAI is "the" Top Class. No, it is the class chosen
for the World Championship aerobatic competitions. Because of that, every
country that wants to participate in the WC must have flyers who prepare using
the same standards, same sequences, as the other countries. I think the US
provides that, and even CD's include FAI-F3A events in the typical pattern
contest.
Is there ANYONE out here who honestly believes that the FAI class is not a
"professional" class of competition?? Please....look at where the money is
spent, the sponsorships "pay", etc. I am perfectly comfortable being thought
of as "Amateur" if I fly AMA pattern....doesn't ruffle my feathers at all.
At the "Professional" level of sports, there are rules that the Amateurs
don't have. Football is a good example.
I happen to believe that our Masters' class, as the top of the AMA heap,
must represent the best we have in US competition. IF folks want to compete at
the International WORLD level, professional competitions, then I'd bet they
will come FROM our Masters class. And to me, that means that they learn the
"new" Professional Sequences/rules that are needed when they make that choice.
It's not our job in the AMA Pattern classes to make a person competent at
FAI. It is our responsibility to provide interesting challenge, growth, and
INVOLVEMENT opportunities for the majority of the 2% of all modelers who choose
pattern in the first place. Let's build maneuvers in sequences that provide
the skill base...then let those who are "advanced" enough, learn the rest.
There's plenty of mentors out there for them to feed each other....
Before ya'll go crazy and start typing like mad.....
I am *NOT* saying that we exclude FAI, or discontinue or support of the
World team, or any of that stuff. That's good for the global community.
I am saying that we should look a little closer at why we have the game
in the US, and design everything we do around THAT purpose. Whatever it is
deemed to be.
Bob Pastorello
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050103/8bc5738f/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list