Sequence Poll Results

[Bob Richards]

I second that. Well said.
 
Bob Richards.

Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:

I'll bet that many of the people who voted NO on having the progression 
of AMA classes designed to prepare for F3A were saying, "I don't think 
the construction of the progression of maneuver schedules should be 
dictated by a maneuver schedule we have no control over." I, for one, 
feel that way. I feel that the Master class, the terminus of the AMA 
maneuver schedule sequence, should reflect what members of NSRCA want. 
We can't affect what FAI does to the F3A maneuver schedule. If we 
tailor the Master class maneuver schedule to what is in the F3A 
maneuver schedule, we will be tinkering with it continuously and 
changes to the Master class maneuver will often dictate changes to the 
maneuver schedules in the other classes. I believe we should decide 
what we want to do and do it.

Ron Van Putte

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050102/26cfc41d/attachment.html