Weight limit discussion
BUDDYonRC at aol.com
BUDDYonRC at aol.com
Thu Feb 24 10:08:09 AKST 2005
Weight Limit Rules Discussion
Following is my consolidation of information and comments received on this
subject that I have used to form my opinion on this subject.
First a few opinions, facts, descriptions, logic and general guidelines that
I have obtained from talking to many experienced pattern pilots, designers
and builders that could effect the understanding of the requirements of
design, construction and participation critical to the long term growth and well
being of the pattern community. I have used these to put the subject at hand
in the proper prospective.
1. A two-meter pattern airplane is not required to compete successfully
in Sportsman and Intermediate.
2. A properly trimmed aircraft is required for all classes.
3. It is less difficult to be successful in all classes if you are
flying an airplane designed specifically for pattern.
4. Skill and practice are more important than utilizing the latest
state of the art design to achieve success and gain a competitive advantage in
competition.
5. Light flies better.
6. The optimum wing loading for a pattern aircraft is one pound per one
hundred square inches of wing area.
7. Weight exceeding the optimum wing loading is a disadvantage.
8. Increasing the weight of an aircraft will increase the power
requirement exponentially.
9. A state of the art, latest design is not required to be competitive
in any AMA class.
10. Most state of the art airplanes were designed for competition in the
FAI class.
11. An airplane designed for pattern will be more competitive than a
smaller airplane even if it is somewhat over weight.
12. An increase in the weight limit to twelve pounds may level the
playing field between IC and electric powered pattern aircraft.
13. If the weight limit were increased to twelve pounds someone at some
future date may find a way to gain an advantage in competition.
14. Most new designs are the results of the ever-changing requirements
of the FAI pattern.
15. Changing the weight limit to twelve pounds will make more pattern
legal airplanes available at a lower cost.
16. Changing the weight limit to twelve pounds will not affect the
current trend in pattern design it will only make more airplanes AMA legal. And
reduce the cost.
17. If the two-meter size limit is maintained most top competition
pilots will still be designing, building and flying airplanes of optimum design
weighing on an average of ten pounds four ounces.
18. The two-meter size limit should be the only rule required to
maintain pattern design at the present level into the future even if the weight
limit is increased to twelve pounds.
19. Lowering the cost requirements may attract more people to pattern.
20. Increasing the weight limit to twelve pounds may ultimately result
in larger aircraft, make all current state of the art airplanes obsolete and
increase the cost
21. Twenty to thirty percent of all pattern planes flown in local
contests are over the eleven-pound weight limit.
22. More people may fly pattern if they can use an ARF that is in the
lower price range.
23. Cheaper versions of pattern capable ARF’s end up slightly over
weight.
24. Raising the weight limit may increase Nat’s participation.
25. Reducing the weight of a pattern plane that is slightly over weight
could cost several hundred dollars if lighter weight equipment must be used.
26. Average cost for the latest state of the art pattern airplane is
about twenty-five hundred dollars.
27. Many pattern pilots and some who would like to fly pattern cannot
afford the cost of the latest state of the art pattern airplane.
28. Flying pattern has become an exclusive event.
29. In order to increase pattern participation the pattern community
must adopt methods to make it an inclusive event.
30. In AMA pattern a suitable design contributes ten percent to the
pilots success, and practice the other ninety percent.
31. Most current state of the art designs have a wing span less than two
meters and less than eleven hundred square inches in area.
32. Increasing the weight limit to twelve pounds may result in reducing
current participation.
33. Increasing the weight limit to twelve pounds may result in increased
participation.
34. The eleven-pound weight rule is not a rule that was added to the
pattern rules as a design limit, This rule dates back many years and was adopted
by FAI to define model aircraft and set the requirements for setting world
records.
35. Many AMA rules set minimum weight limits to eliminate a performance
advantage.
36. The only maximum weight rules required by AMA were added to maintain
safety.
37. Raising the weight limit to twelve pounds will not pose a safety
issue and in fact may increase the margin of safety.
38. Due to the necessity to build light, failures have occurred when
weight was considered more important and strength of the airframe was
jeopardized to meet the weight limit.
39. When the rules were changed in the past participation went down.
40. There are pilots who would attend the Nat’s simply for the Nat’s
experience but wont due to the fact that the airplane they fly in local events
is overweight and they would be disqualified.
41. Weight rules are not enforced at local contests.
42. Pattern rules are illegitimate it is widely known and accepted that
a double standard exists and if enforced participation would be reduced
drastically.
Buddy Brammer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050224/4d0da413/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list