[SPAM] Re: Re: Mid Air Question

Ed Alt ed_alt at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 16 20:49:21 AKST 2005


You could try!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Ivey" <jivey61 at bellsouth.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Mid Air Question


> Ed
> Does that mean when I goof a manouver I can call avoidance and get to 
> refly it?
> I like that.
> Jim Ivey
>>
>> From: "Ed  Alt" <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
>> Date: 2005/02/16 Wed PM 09:49:29 EST
>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Subject: Re: Re: Mid Air Question
>>
>> Calling "avoidance" by either pilot or caller has become customary at 
>> many
>> IMAC contests, but I don't remember it ever being a rule.
>>
>> Ed
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Wayne Galligan" <wgalligan at goodsonacura.com>
>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:58 PM
>> Subject: Re: Re: Mid Air Question
>>
>>
>> >I think IMAC has an interference rule but I don't think pattern does.
>> > Usually the collision occurs faster then one could react to avoiding 
>> > it.
>> > Even with callers or observers it still happens.  All part of being in 
>> > a
>> > finite area and most people are trying to fly at that ideal position
>> > between
>> > 125-150 meters out.
>> >
>> > Knocking on wood....
>> >
>> > Wayne G.
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>> > From: "Richard Strickland" <richard.s at allied-callaway.com>
>> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 2:19 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Re: Mid Air Question
>> >
>> >
>> >> Because you HAVE to have two flight lines if you've got more than 
>> >> fifteen
>> >> pilots and most runways aren't long enough to get far enough apart
>> >> without
>> >> some cross over.  Maybe there should be an 'overs' on close calls if 
>> >> the
>> >> caller or pilot calls it.  Did I really say that?!
>> >>
>> >> Richard
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: <bdbd at bellsouth.net>
>> >> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:34 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: Re: Mid Air Question
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Here is what I don't get.  Most of these midairs were at 
>> >> > competitions.
>> > It
>> >> would seem to me that the competition coordinator/ manager would set 
>> >> up
>> > the
>> >> flight lines where there is no interference from multiple planes. It
>> >> would
>> >> seem to me that if the coordinator was held accountable for these 
>> >> midairs
>> >> there would be alot fewer incidents. If I am flying a $2000 + bird I
>> >> would
>> >> make dern sure that my plane was in no jepardy of a mid air.  These
>> >> planes
>> >> are way to expensive to become combat models. If I wanted to fly 
>> >> combat I
>> >> would choose a much cheaper and more durable plane.  Why don't we 
>> >> spend
>> > more
>> >> time trying to make the events safer and less money and time building
>> > combat
>> >> planes.
>> >> >
>> >> > Dan
>> >> > >
>> >> > > From: Bob Richards <bob at toprudder.com>
>> >> > > Date: 2005/02/16 Wed AM 08:36:54 EST
>> >> > > To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> >> > > Subject: Re: Mid Air Question
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I'm not sure about the sound AFTER the midair, but I imagine the
>> >> > > sound
>> >> BEFORE the midair is something like: "Hay, y'all, watch this!".   :-)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Bob R.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > rcaerobob at cox.net wrote:
>> >> > > What sound most frequently is heard following the D6 mid-airs??
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Bob Pastorello, El Reno, OK, USA
>> >> > > rcaerobob at cox.net
>> >> > > www.rcaerobats.net
>> >> > >
>> >> > > =================================================
>> >> > > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> >> > > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> >> > > To be removed from this list, go to
>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> >> > > and follow the instructions.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > =================================================
>> >> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> >> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> >> > To be removed from this list, go to
>> >> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> >> > and follow the instructions.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> =================================================
>> >> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> >> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> >> To be removed from this list, go to 
>> >> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> >> and follow the instructions.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > =================================================
>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> > To be removed from this list, go to 
>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> > and follow the instructions.
>> >
>> >
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>>
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> 
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list