[SPAM] Re: Moki 180

[Bill Glaze]

Ron:
I've been quite happy with mine; they have always started very easily 
and run well.  I've heard all these stories about pumping/regulating 
them etc. but I honestly don't know why one would need to do so, other 
than a defective setup in the first place.  I just run muffler pressure.
Now, fuel:
I experimented with some 15% that I run in my Y.S.engines.  As the Moki 
neared full throttle, I could plainly hear it rattling.  (with my 
hearing, that in itself is a minor miracle.)  So, I drained the 15% and 
put in some 5% that I happened to have.  Ran well, but after it heated 
up, I could detect some detonation.  So, I drained out the 5% and put in 
some FAI that I had been using.  Not only did the detonation cease, but 
I picked up some 400 rpm.  I was curious, so I called Gerrard, 
(importer, at that time.)  Jim said that I wasn't dreaming; the engine 
was designed for FAI fuel, and that they absolutely would recommend no 
more than 5% fuel, and that to be used only in the winter to help 
starting.  I don't remember numbers, but I do remember that it will idle 
for 5 minutes at 1800 rpm, and then immediately accelerate to full 
throttle when asked.  That's Jim Gerrard's criterion.  I'm not sure my 
Y.S. engines will do that.  Since I've gotten so heavily into pattern, I 
have done very little with anything else.  So, the information is 
probably a year old.  The Moki's are in (Individually, of course<G>) a 
Midwest Extra 300 which weighs 14 lb. 4 ozs.  and I use a Mesjlik 20-10 
prop.  This is the only airplane I have ever owned that will truly go 
out of sight straight up, (John Ferrell was a witness on this!) and will 
do a true, round knife-edge loop.  And, with the recommended Bisson 
muffler, I get quite a few comments about how quiet the airplane is.  It 
sounds mellow, but I've never Db'd it.  Fun to own and fly?  You bet! :-)
HTH
Bill Glaze

Ron Van Putte wrote:

>
>
> On Feb 16, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:
>
>     To be honest, if weight wasn't an issue, I would use the MOKI 180.
>     I have not used an engine more user friendly or more robust than
>     that one, and has power to burn. Piped, propped and mounted
>     correctly, it could be made fairly quiet. It was nice to just fuel
>     it, prime it, one flip start it, and have it last several seasons
>     without any hint of a problem. No bearings, no rods, no rings, or
>     anything else for that matter.
>
>
> I have virtually no experience with MOKI engines, other than to sell 
> fuel to owners and listen to complaints from the ones who aren't 
> convinced that MOKIs want/need low % nitro fuel to operate properly. 
> Does anyone care to comment which fuel works best in their MOKI?
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050216/af97b2cf/attachment.html