4-40 or 6-32 control arms?
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Tue Feb 15 11:29:32 AKST 2005
Rick, exactly right. They will shear off at the base where the load is
maximized. It's less of an issue with the case hardened bolts since there is
substantial margin for error, but if that was to break, that's where it would
appen.
By usingthe partially threaded bolts, the moment arm is reduced and the load
at the base of the thread decreased. If it ever broke, (doubtful) it would
break at the base of the thread, most likely. The core diameter is smaller
there than the shank diameter.
Epoxying the shank of the bolt into the hard point works great.
I prefer the softer bolts because I can bend these easily with the technique
I have outlined before, to bring the actuation point on the hinge line.
MatK
In a message dated 2/15/2005 2:57:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
knowhow3 at bellsouth.net writes:
Is the failure point on these bolts always at the base where it goes into
the control surface? Never having had a failure of one, I don't know, but
physics kind of dictates that it would be.
If so, why wouldn't a socket head or other type bolt that is only partially
threaded work better, since it would remove the stress risers (threads) at
the base area, where the force is concentrated. Lop off the bolt head and glue
it in. The smooth portion of the bolt could easily be roughed up with a
Dremel sanding drum or cutoff wheel for CA or epoxy to grip it going into the
control surface.
Am I missing something obvious here with this idea?
Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050215/1439e559/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list