Robart incidence meter calibration
John Ferrell
johnferrell at earthlink.net
Fri Feb 4 15:55:57 AKST 2005
Unless you are the kind of fellow that wears two watches, never use two Robart incidence indicators on the same airplane. Like the watches, they will never agree!
John Ferrell
http://DixieNC.US
----- Original Message -----
From: ronlock at comcast.net
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Robart incidence meter calibration
Agree,
And would add, always set up the level with the same side forward.
If I swap my robart meter 180 degrees, it's off a bit.
Ron Lockhart
-------------- Original message --------------
I don't even try to use the bubble level. As long as you set the fuselage's datum line to what the meter itself says is zero, you can make all your other measurements relative to that reference. It then measures degrees + or - from zero, not from level. Seems to work out OK for me. I do the same for the GP laser incidence meter, which I find more accurate anyway.
Rick
-------Original Message-------
From: discussion at nsrca.org
Date: Friday, February 04, 2005 09:59:33 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Robart incidence meter calibration
Has any tried to calibrate their Robart incidence meter, or sent it back to
have it done? The bubble level appears accurate, but the meter is way off
from where the bubble syas is level. I've checked it against two other
levels, and the level bubble on the Robart meter is ok.
Thanks.
Jon A. Lowe
Deputy Project Manager
Close Combat Weapon Systems Project Office
jon.lowe at msl.army.mil
256-876-5185
DSN 746-5185
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050205/69d93705/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list