Composite-ARF Impact question
DaveL322 at comcast.net
DaveL322 at comcast.net
Wed Feb 2 07:26:23 AKST 2005
Consider it analagous to a Tim Taylor "har-har-har" growl/grunt/utterance of manly approval.
-------------- Original message --------------
> OK - I'll bite - what's a "Harrumph" in cyber/mail-ease???
> Is it a , or , , .... Which?
>
> OR is it the "how dare you say such a thing?"
> >
> > From:
> > Date: 2005/02/02 Wed AM 10:52:11 EST
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question
> >
> > Another Harruummph is in order.
> > >
> > > From: Bill Southwell
> > > Date: 2005/02/02 Wed PM 12:13:03 EST
> > > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > > Subject: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question
> > >
> > >
> > > Ed I think you hit the nail on the head. It is hard on ones ego to
> > > over pay for a product and then find there are imperfections to boot.
> > > There are a few domestic kit makers left, lets support them!
> > >
> > > Mark thats exactly what I have been mad as he## about. Geitz made a
> > > marketing coo when he got a lot of big name folks to sell and fly his
> > > stuff as "REP'S". Now they have financial stake to protect the product
> > > beyond a simple sponsorship. I can't see a little fellow walking up to
> > > big Andy Kane and telling him "that's a piece of crap!" You get
> > > intimidated by "star quality" reps and no lack of them. Brilliant! makes
> > > for a bunch of sheeple. Who does a little guy think he is challenging
> > > that system...he would look like "Chicken Little" and just get a letter
> > > explaining how wrong he is about his product.
> > >
> > > Lets support all those folks that are left in the states and get the
> > > pipe line going again. Heck maybe a few might sprout up if we show some
> > > interest$$ Look at last years Symphony, Panacea, and the Titan. EVERY
> > > bit as good and priced a heck of a lot better than CompARF,ZN Line or PL
> > > Products. Time to be rid of the Chevy vs BMW mentality. I for one would
> > > say the customer support at Aeroslave and PAC way out shines the
> > > "concubines" and the " it's twisted but all 350 fly perfect straight "
> > > load of ahh... fertilizer. I have delt with the two companies and find
> > > them to be helpful way beyond reasonable. When did customer service,
> > > and believing in the people you are dealing with go out the window when
> > > we make our purchasing decisions? Why?
> > >
> > > OK lets have a little bit of feed back from the " no American company
> > > can match the quality of the European manufactures" supporters and
> > > discuss this issue. Might be interesting....................Might help
> > > our Cottage industry get a little wind in there sales. Wait lets go a
> > > little further and start a Good guys list if you received a good vale
> > > for your$$ or a great experience from the supplier service wise. I'll
> > > put my keyboard were my mouth is and start the thread her in a minute. I
> > > bet the feed back might be a breath of fresh air on the list and for all
> > > those brave souls who try to make our toys for very little reward dollar
> > > wise or "pat on the back" wise.
> > >
> > > Plastic scale modeling has been made far, far better due to cottage
> > > industries. That hobby was on a bad decline not too many years ago.
> > > Cottage industries made far better models possible and broke a downward
> > > spiral and turned it around for scale enthusiast. There are more after
> > > market companies than kit manufactures today.
> > >
> > >
> > > I would also like to say thanks to Adam for getting this thread going
> > > and hope you get your twist worked out.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Bill " now heaping on the coal" Southwell
> > > Iuka,MS
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ed Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > > The American kit manufacturers haven't learned the secret. The more
> > > > one pays for an item, the harder one will defend it and overlook it's
> > > > deficiencies. We had an abundance of American cottage industry kits
> > > > manufacturers AND designers, we drove them out of business with the
> > > > plane of the week mentality.
> > > > Ed M.
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Hunt"
> > > >
> > > > To:
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:05 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> I'm gonna say it.....just can't hold back.....if an Aires fuse was
> > > >> like this we'd be hearing all about how hard it is to find a quality
> > > >> pattern kit in the US. Drives me nuts that so many people have been
> > > >> fixing this without so much as one bad word about this company.....
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> there...I feel better.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Black"
> > > >> To:
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:23 PM
> > > >> Subject: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> OK guys, all this talk has gotten me to take another look at my new
> > > >>> Impact.
> > > >>> Here's what I see.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 1) I cannot detect any twist in the fin. Perhaps someone can tell me
> > > >>> how to
> > > >>> look for this, but I can't see it.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2) If I measure for straightness in the fuse it is not perfectly
> > > >>> straight.
> > > >>> It's hard to tell if the left side is just a little fuller (puffy)
> > > >>> or if it
> > > >>> is bent. Whatever the case, it's not perfectly symmetrical. I did
> > > >>> notice
> > > >>> when mounting the gear that the *inside* of one half was slightly
> > > >>> flatter
> > > >>> than the other side. Specifics of my measurements: I lined up the
> > > >>> fuse on
> > > >>> graph paper and measured for straightness by setting the nose on the
> > > >>> center
> > > >>> line and the tail on the center line. I then took measurements
> > > >>> periodically
> > > >>> along fuse checking the distance from the center line (using a
> > > >>> square). At
> > > >>> the most extreme point the left side is wider by about 1/4". To
> > > >>> double check
> > > >>> I then centered the mid-point of the fuse and the nose. This
> > > >>> resulted in the
> > > >>> rudder being about 1/4" off to the right.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I know it's preferable to have a perfectly straight fuse, but
> > > >>> considering
> > > >>> the overall size of the fuse, how well I've seen other Impacts fly,
> > > >>> (and the
> > > >>> fact that I already own it), I'm not going to worry about. With all the
> > > >>> right thrust discussions held lately I'm sure I can get it trimmed
> > > >>> to fly
> > > >>> fine. Also, given it's a molded fuse I'm sure that Jason's was the
> > > >>> same and
> > > >>> he did pretty well with his ;-)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> BTW, I did the same measurements on both of my Aries fuses prior to
> > > >>> building
> > > >>> and they were extremely straight. Knowing all the work Lance and
> > > >>> Gray put
> > > >>> into the Symphony I'm sure it's dead on as well.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Keith Black
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Southwell"
> > > >>>
> > > >>> To:
> > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:42 PM
> > > >>> Subject: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hi Adam,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hey at least no mention of concubines or other strange behavior. If
> > > >>>> all of you are having a vision problem ( mass hallucination) there
> > > >>>> will
> > > >>>> be a group therapy session at the NATS. I hope this will help all
> > > >>>> CompARF customers to get with the program...err ah how not to see
> > > >>>> things. It is funny its no manufacturing error but everyone has
> > > >>>> had the
> > > >>>> same issue. I bet the fellow who crates the fuselages gets a broom
> > > >>>> tomorrow to work with. You have to be in awe of his consistency in
> > > >>>> applying pressure to each fuse. Thank goodness he studied the
> > > >>>> aerodynamics of the thing...he must be a genius as all 350 fly dead
> > > >>>> straight now!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> If a manufacture in the states created a ahhh a well...... "visual
> > > >>>> effect" like that people would be slamming the same for lack of
> > > >>>> quality
> > > >>>> and ripping the customer off. I have talked to several friends who
> > > >>>> have
> > > >>>> the gassser CompARF planes and they have reported quality issues and
> > > >>>> felt that for the money it could have been better. guess its a case
> > > >>>> of "
> > > >>>> international tolerance and good will" at work here ( Geez now I am
> > > >>>> sounding like Mike Savage). I say don't be intimidated and demand a
> > > >>>> refund for the banana. He gives you all your ammunition in his
> > > >>>> reply...well at the bottom any how. I still think if he added
> > > >>>> something
> > > >>>> with concubines and court it would be more interesting to
> > > >>>> read...................................................Just basking in
> > > >>>> the flames here :>)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards
> > > >>>> Bill " medium to well done" Southwell
> > > >>>> Iuka, MS
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Adam Quennoz wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> > I'm glad to see others are seeing the same thing. I thought I was
> > > >>>> > nuts. I e-mailed Composite-ARF about this issue. Here's the reply:
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > Hello Adam,
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > since 350 Impacts come from the same molds, and all fly perfectly
> > > >>>> > straight,
> > > >>>> > there is no manufacturing error in yours.
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > The center line (seam line) is a little bit out of center, this
> > > >>>> might
> > > >>>> > make
> > > >>>> > it appear not straight, possibly.
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > If the fuselage got pressure during shipping / storing, so that the
> > > >>>> > fin was
> > > >>>> > slightly twisted in the box, this can be easily fixed when gluing
> > > >>>> in > the
> > > >>>> > rear hinge post. But actually, I do not think that you would have to
> > > >>>
> > > >>> make
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> > any corrections, as I know that the fin appears to be a little bit
> > > >>>> > off, but
> > > >>>> > it doesn't. the planes fly dead straight.
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > =================================================
> > > >>>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > > >>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > > >>>> > To be removed from this list, go to >
> > > >>>> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > > >>>> > and follow the instructions.
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> =================================================
> > > >>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > > >>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > > >>>> To be removed from this list, go to
> > > >>>> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > > >>>> and follow the instructions.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> =================================================
> > > >>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > > >>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > > >>> To be removed from this list, go to
> > > >>> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > > >>> and follow the instructions.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> =================================================
> > > >> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > > >> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > > >> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > > >> and follow the instructions.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > =================================================
> > > > To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > > > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > > > To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > > > and follow the instructions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > =================================================
> > > To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > > To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > > and follow the instructions.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > =================================================
> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > and follow the instructions.
> >
> >
>
> Bob Pastorello, El Reno, OK, USA
> rcaerobob at cox.net
> www.rcaerobats.net
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050202/95cc7556/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list