[NSRCA-discussion] F3a Shocky C.G.

Michael Laggis fishgod at pobox.mtaonline.net
Wed Dec 21 19:35:35 AKST 2005


I fly with am batteries as far back as possible.  There seem to be no ill 
effects.  Flying indoors it is better to have a rearward CG.  It allows you 
to fly slow around the gym.  Kind of flying high alpha around the room.  I 
love mine I have been flying it for a year now.

Thanks
Michael Laggis
AKA Moose Boy
NSRCA 3618
http://www.alaskarc.org

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Pavlick" <jpavlick at idseng.com>
To: "NSRCA Discussion" <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 6:32 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] F3a Shocky C.G.


> Kind of not pattern related but I'm sure someone can answer this: What is
> the most rearward C.G. that anyone has flown the F3a Shock-Flyer with? I'm
> getting mine ready for its first flight now and unless I put the batteries
> all the way up front (as in right behind the motor) I end up tail heavy at
> best. At least according to the instructions. I'm using an AXI 2204/54 
> right
> on the nose and T.P. 3C/480's. The recommended C.G. looks rather nose 
> heavy
> so I'm thinking maybe 1" back from what they recommend might be OK?
>
> John Pavlick
> http://www.idseng.com
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date: 12/21/05
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> 




More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list