Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
George Kennie
geobet at gis.net
Wed Aug 3 09:19:54 AKDT 2005
Hey Don,
I'm not sure if I'm reading this right or not, but the low percentages in rounds
2 & 4 in Intermediate, Advanced, and Masters and rounds 3&5 in FAI may present
an opportunity to establish a conclusion regarding who is doing it most nearly
"right" by analizing the panel membership.Maybe these guys have something to
teach the rest of us.
Georgie
Don Ramsey wrote:
> Wow, looks like judging of Intermediate was excellent. Could be that when
> snaps and spins enter the picture the score are much more diverse. A 2
> point spead in the 15% range is acceptable but this doesn't seem to be very
> good overall. To summarize:
>
> 2 pt spread - Average
> Intermediate 13.1%
> Advance 24.15%
> Masters 20.11%
> FAI 25.23%
>
> 3 pt spread - Average
> Intermediate 2.94%
> Advance 6.55%
> Masters 4.87%
> FAI 5.20%
>
> Judging needs some more work...
>
> Don
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gene Maurice" <gene.maurice at comcast.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 10:36 AM
> Subject: RE: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
>
> > Earl, Buddy,
> >
> > Here it is..............
> >
> > Intermediate - 14 Contestants x 15 In-Flight Maneuvers = 210 Scoring
> > Opportunities
> > Round 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
> > No of 2pt "Spreads" 26 31 21 29 17 41 27.50
> > % of 210 12.38% 14.76% 10.00% 13.81% 8.10% 19.52% 13.10%
> >
> > No of 3pt "Spreads" 4 11 6 6 1 9 6.17
> > % of 210 1.90% 5.24% 2.86% 2.86% 0.48% 4.29% 2.94%
> >
> > Advanced - 22 Contestants x 17 In-Flight Maneuvers = 374 Scoring
> > Opportunities
> > Round 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
> > No of 2pt "Spreads" 102 69 163 82 77 49 90.33
> > % of 374 27.27% 18.45% 43.58% 21.93% 20.59% 13.10% 24.15%
> >
> > No of 3pt "Spreads" 23 19 67 18 11 9 24.50
> > % of 374 6.15% 5.08% 17.91% 4.81% 2.94% 2.41% 6.55%
> >
> > Masters Preliminaries - 38 Contestants x 21 In-Flight Maneuvers = 798
> > Scoring Opportunities
> > Round 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
> > No of 2pt "Spreads" 130 108 208 107 210 200 160.50
> > % of 798 16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41% 26.32% 25.06% 20.11%
> >
> > No of 3pt "Spreads" 34 28 59 24 49 39 38.83
> > % of 798 4.26% 3.51% 7.39% 3.01% 6.14% 4.89% 4.87%
> >
> > FAI Preliminaries - 29 Contestants x 21 In-Flight Maneuvers = 609 Scoring
> > Opportunities
> > Round 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
> > No of 2pt "Spreads" 129 155 119 229 114 176 153.67
> > % of 609 21.18% 25.45% 19.54% 37.60% 18.72% 28.90% 25.23%
> >
> > No of 3pt "Spreads" 18 38 16 59 21 38 31.67
> > % of 609 2.96% 6.24% 2.63% 9.69% 3.45% 6.24% 5.20%
> >
> >
> >
> > Gene Maurice
> > gene.maurice at comcast.net
> > Plano, TX
> > AMA 3408, NSRCA 877
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> > On
> > Behalf Of Earl Haury
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:31 AM
> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Subject: Re: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
> >
> > Gene
> >
> > Good info, and pretty reasonable spreads. It would be interesting to see
> > like data from the other classes. One might expect Masters to have the
> > lowest spread, as they are being judged by the most experienced fliers
> > (not
> > necessarily judges).
> >
> > Earl
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gene Maurice
> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:51 AM
> > Subject: RE: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
> >
> >
> > Don,
> >
> > Here's some stats to mull over........
> >
> > I've pulled all of the scores into a spreadsheet and identified every
> > instance where the difference between any of the 3 judges raw scores was
> > plus or minus more than 2 points, then plus or minus more than 3 points
> >
> > Masters Prelims had 38 pilots actually flying x 21 scored maneuvers
> > (excluded TO and Land.) = 798 "judging opportunities" in each of 6
> > rounds.
> >
> > Round 1 2 3
> > 4 5 6
> > No of 2pt "Spreads" 130 108 208 107
> > 210 200
> > % of 798 16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41%
> > 26.32% 25.06%
> >
> > No of 3pt "Spreads" 34 28 59 24
> > 49 39
> > % of 798 4.26% 3.51% 7.39% 3.01%
> > 6.14% 4.89%
> >
> > Gene Maurice
> > gene.maurice at comcast.net
> > Plano, TX
> > AMA 3408, NSRCA 877
> >
> >
> >
> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> > On
> > Behalf Of Don Ramsey
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:02 PM
> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Subject: Re: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
> >
> > We have heard from a lot of Advanced pilots about the judging on that
> > line.
> > I would like some feed back from Masters and FAI on the prelims judges.
> > My
> > very limited survey seems to indicated that those lines had very good
> > judging. I had a lot of 5s & 6s and some good scores but overall my
> > scores,
> >
> > in my opinion, were spot on. I'm only asking about the prelims.
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
> > =================================================
> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > and follow the instructions.
> >
> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
> > list.
> >
> > =================================================
> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > and follow the instructions.
> >
> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
> > list.
> >
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list