Performance Judging? Trial Balloon

[Gene Maurice]

Don,

 

Here's some stats to mull over........

 

I've pulled all of the scores into a spreadsheet and identified every
instance where the difference between any of the 3 judges raw scores was
plus or minus more than 2 points, then plus or minus more than 3 points

 

Masters Prelims had 38 pilots actually flying x 21 scored maneuvers
(excluded TO and Land.) = 798  "judging opportunities" in each of 6 rounds.

 

Round                                       1          2          3
4          5          6

No of  2pt "Spreads"                   130       108       208       107
210       200

% of 798                                   16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41%
26.32% 25.06%

 

No of  3pt "Spreads"                   34         28         59         24
49         39

% of 798                                   4.26%   3.51%   7.39%   3.01%
6.14%   4.89%

 

Gene Maurice

gene.maurice at comcast.net

Plano, TX

AMA 3408, NSRCA 877

  _____  

From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Don Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:02 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon

 

We have heard from a lot of Advanced pilots about the judging on that line.
I would like some feed back from Masters and FAI on the prelims judges.  My
very limited survey seems to indicated that those lines had very good
judging.  I had a lot of 5s & 6s and some good scores but overall my scores,
in my opinion, were spot on.  I'm only asking about the prelims.

 

Don

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050803/348b1712/attachment.html