[SPAM] Re: Fw: Contest

[Ed Miller]

I never understood why all the CD's in neighboring states weren't tied together in a network so things like this wouldn't happen. That's where you avoid this problem, not a the district VP level. 
Ed M.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Glaze 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 10:15 AM
  Subject: Re: Fw: Contest


  Scott:
  It doesn't need to be a problem; the secret is communication.  But, there is little anybody can do if the sanction is applied for by the CD and nobody else is aware of it.  Which usually becomes the case, and the conflicts are known only after the fact.  And,  while it is easily possible for the District VP to handle his own district, it gets stickier when there are 2 or even 3 districts involved.  Perhaps this position of Competitions Manager could help, if it's implemented.  As John says, probably no harm done in this case; I don't see much intermingling of our 2 Districts going on.  But, still and all, it would be much better to try to synchronize these contests.  Perhaps doing so would encourage more inter-district visits.  It would be advantageous.

  Bill Glaze
  D2 VP

  Scott Anderson wrote: 
    This becoming more of a problem.  I send in the sanction every year right after the meet.. Maybe the  AMA contest coordinators need to look at this.  This is the second meet in D2 that weekend..  Maybe the VP's or AVP's can work on this for next year..


    Scott Anderson
    D3 AVP 
    NSRCA 528
    ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: DaddyB3089 at aol.com 
      To: discussion at nsrca.org 
      Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 8:56 PM
      Subject: Re: Fw: Contest


      I did not know of the Knoxville contest upon sending in for the Sanction. I guess because of the districts being different, both went thru.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050418/17281aa9/attachment-0001.html