Hydrimax batteries
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sun Oct 31 15:41:51 AKST 2004
Yes you are right about the alert. And on the Hydrimax/Panasonic deal, it
sounds like they may have changed battery construction. I didn't know that;
thanks for letting me know
MattK
In a message dated 10/31/2004 5:24:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,
cjm767driver at hotmail.com writes:
Hi Matt:
It's kind of strange. I know that Hydrimax is a Panasonic cell "name", but
the pack says on the outside "Genuine Sanyo Cells". Sure enough, inside of a
Hydrimax pack are Sanyo cells. I really had no issue with the way the packs
performed with the Sanyo cells, but I think the construction and danger of a
cut lead and lost plane makes them unsafe. Oh well, at least there are
plenty of good options for battery packs. I wanted to make sure anyone who is
running the Hydrimax packs check for cut leads before it's too late.
Chris
_Rcmaster199 at aol.com_ (mailto:Rcmaster199 at aol.com) wrote:
Chris, you might consider NiMH batteries from Radical RC. I have used their
1650 ma 4.8 volt pack in my pattern planes ( on the second plane now) 3 whole
seasons now. I bought two of these packs going on 4 years, but I still have
the second pack NIP. Used pack is still cycling very close to new, after
about 600 flights, which is equivalent to about 150 charge cycles.
Liked the airborne so much, I outfitted my 10X transmitter also about 18
months ago. The 1650 TX pack needs charging only about every fourth session
Radical has very good information on the care and feeding of NiMH bats and
other bats as well on their website. I have found his information to be on the
money.
Prices for Sanyo cell batteries simply are unbeatable. BTW, I remember
speaking with him about cell differences at the Southeast Model Show in Georgia a
couple years back, and he explained that Panasonic cells (Hydrimax) do not
have the internal robustness of Sanyo cells. He uses Sanyo only in his packs
MattK
In a message dated 10/31/2004 3:43:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
_robcase1 at cox.net_ (mailto:robcase1 at cox.net) writes:
Cris, I find that very disturbing. What is the next choice of batterries
out there?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041031/fa36a41b/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list