CD's
Jeff H. Snider
jeff at snider.com
Thu Oct 28 13:57:45 AKDT 2004
Coming from outside, I'm amazed we don't have a process for ranking
judges in this sport. It may be that a Sportsman has keen eyes and
a good understanding of the rules, and can capably judge Masters,
or even FAI, even though he doesn't yet have the skill to compete
in Intermediate. It may also be that a Masters pilot lacks the
proper temperment or attention span and can't consistently judge
an entire round of any class.
Unfortunately we don't have any idea how accurate or consistent any
one of us is. I wonder if this is being or ever has been addressed.
Lacking that information, it seems like the only thing we can do
is to assume a pilot's class also gives a fair representation of
his judging ability. In situations where you have too few pilots
in neighboring classes you have to reach further afield. It seems
obvious you can rely on some Sportsmen, but not all of them, to
judge Intermediate pretty well. But make sure you don't have two
untested judges working the same round.
In the end, the CD's judgement is all you have to work with. If
he looked at the sportsment present and knew none of them were ready
to judge, perhaps the decision was for the better.
-Jeff
Mark Grabowski writes:
> Well, I'm a complete pattern nobody BUT I know that as a novice or even
> sportsman flyer I would feel very unqualified to fairly and adequately judge
> an upper-level flyer. I'd probably want to scribe, listen and learn from the
> "advanced" judges but certainly not want my unqualfied .02 cents worth of
> scoring counted....FWIW
> Mark Grabowski
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nat Penton [mailto:natpenton at centurytel.net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 4:08 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: CD's
>
>
> The Sulphur , La. contest was just completed with six rounds flown. There
> were 23 fliers with 8 sportsman and 7 intermediate.
>
> The judge assignments were approached with the following (mis) conceptions:
> Sportsman no judging
> Intermediate Sports and Adv only
>
This placed quite a burden on the upper class judges.
>
> Would appreciate comments regarding criteria. TIA
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Confidentiality Note: The contents of this e-mail message and its
> attachments, if any, are intended solely for the addressee(s) hereof. If
> you are not the named addressee, or if you believe this message has been
> addressed to you in error, you are requested not to read, disclose,
> reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this information.
> Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s)
> is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality. If you have received
> this transmission in error, please alert the sender by reply e-mail. It is
> also requested that you immediately delete this message and its
> attachments, if any. Thank You.
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C4BD33.B895E6F0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> <HTML>
> <BODY>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
>
>
> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
> <DIV><SPAN class=968372021-28102004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Well,
> I'm a complete pattern nobody BUT I know that as a novice or even sportsman
> flyer I would feel very unqualified to fairly and adequately judge an
> upper-level flyer. I'd probably want to scribe, listen and learn from the
> "advanced" judges but certainly not want my unqualfied .02 cents worth of
> scoring counted....FWIW</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=968372021-28102004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Mark
> Grabowski</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
> size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Nat Penton
> [mailto:natpenton at centurytel.net]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, October 28, 2004
> 4:08 PM<BR><B>To:</B> discussion at nsrca.org<BR><B>Subject:</B>
> CD's<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The Sulphur , La. contest was just completed with
> six rounds flown. There were 23 fliers with 8 sportsman and 7
> intermediate.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The judge assignments were approached with the
> following (mis) conceptions:</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
> Sportsman no
> judging</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial
> size=2> Intermediate
> Sports and Adv only</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This placed quite a burden on the upper class
> judges.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Would appreciate comments regarding criteria.
> TIA</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
>
> <P><hr size=1></P>
> <P><STRONG>
> Confidentiality Note: The contents of this e-mail message and its
> attachments, if any, are intended solely for the addressee(s) hereof. If
> you are not the named addressee, or if you believe this message has been
> addressed to you in error, you are requested not to read, disclose,
> reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this information.
> Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s)
> is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality. If you have received
> this transmission in error, please alert the sender by reply e-mail. It is
> also requested that you immediately delete this message and its
> attachments, if any. Thank You.
> </STRONG></P>
> </BODY>
> </HTML>
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C4BD33.B895E6F0--
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list