Kavan Starters
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Thu Oct 7 14:44:54 AKDT 2004
Gray:
Big difference was that the Merlin had a 2 stage blower that was
controlled by an aneroid switch at altitude. The Allison was a single
stage blower, so it lost H.P. at altitudes above about 15K. Same
Allison engine was used in the P-38 as you have noted. One can only
wonder how the P-38 would have fared with the Merlin engine. It
certainly would have been noteworthy. After all, with a 52 ft.
wingspan, it was as large as a medium bomber, but a whole lot faster.
Over all, a good airplane, after they solved the compressibility problem.
Bill Glaze
P.S. If anyone objects to this reminiscing, Gray and I will take it
private. Thanks.
Gray E Fowler wrote:
>
> I have only read about it in books or seen it on the Hitler (History)
> Channel. Packard built cuz all RR were being put into Spits and the
> Allison lost HP at altitude, except in the P-38 whereas the used a
> supercharger to compensate. Right?
>
>
>
> Gray Fowler
> Principal Chemical Engineer
> Composites Engineering
>
>
>
> Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
> Sent by: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>
> 10/06/2004 06:22 PM
> Please respond to discussion
>
>
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Kavan Starters
>
>
>
>
> WAR--Hitler marched into Poland. I remember the headlines.
> Er...........somebody told me about them. Yeah, that's
> it...........somebody told me about it. Bill Glaze
>
> Gray E Fowler wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> And it is Packard built because? I know the answer, no one probably
> cares. Perhaps we should stop before someone gets mad. I know my WWII
> stuff......Once as President of my club I had the field gate combo
> changed to 9139.....An old guy asked me why that number and I told him
> it was something I could remember...What date is that? I know you know
>
>
>
> Gray Fowler
> Principal Chemical Engineer
> Composites Engineering
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041007/578be9e3/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list