Surface Flatness, now Faraday cages
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Wed Nov 24 06:25:15 AKST 2004
The windows are sized and shaped such that lightning will have practically
no effect on passengers.
MattK
In a message dated 11/24/2004 9:48:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
bob at toprudder.com writes:
I mentioned that the material used to construct RF shielded rooms would make
a good flat worksurface. Then somebody mentioned "Faraday cage" --
completely off topic for the group. Funny, though, it made it back to "don't build a
fuselage out of this stuff".
You mentioned full-sized aircraft fuselages being Faraday cages, they are to
some extent. Not only can the fuse shell keep signals out, they can also
keep signals in. Very high field strengths can be achieved with very little
power, and nodes can exist where reflections arrive in phase. This is a very big
problem, and compliance test standards (such as DO-160) exist to insure that
systems inside an aircraft don't emit strong signals that can interfere with
other systesms, and can also still operate when interference is present. This
is also why they don't want computers and electronic equipment operating
during the times that the instrumentation is most needed (takeoff and landing,
especially in IFR conditions).
Bob Richards.
Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:
The tangents that some threads create are often much more interesting than
the original intent of the thread.
Keith I would say it's not a good idea. If you built a fuse out of this
material, (done everyday BTW), I suggest you build it large enough to accomodate
the person flying it (vbg). I know Bill, Don Ramsey and Al Glenn and
probably several more, flew or still fly "Faraday Cages" for a living
Now, how we went from measuring surface flatness to "shielding" devices from
EMI/RFI (regardless of what the emitting source is), is beyond me
MattK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041124/7ef81930/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list